Talkback: New 25% Warmer Polartec PowerShield...

7 messages
15/03/2012 at 18:00
Why put the bright orange high loft lining on the back where your pack is? Doh! You need that on the front and something cooler on the back.
15/03/2012 at 18:17

A bit odd perhaps. The front probably has a lot of doubled materials cf pockets etc which might make a difference.

A bit more confused by the apparent claim that powershield with a high loft backer is new - surely its been around for a good while?

Price also a bit terrifying compared to say the VR guide, Buffalo or even P****o. But that is how high loft powershield tends to work out.

15/03/2012 at 18:22

A cynical observer might point out that relatively few people going to the shops, pub or walking the job wear rucksacks. I can't tell whether the jacket has a helmet compatible hood, for example

Me, I seem to suffer vastly less from a sweaty back when it is properly cold out, even when I am working hard. Maybe I'm unusual?

15/03/2012 at 18:25
Martin Carpenter wrote (see)

A bit more confused by the apparent claim that powershield with a high loft backer is new - surely its been around for a good while?

Price also a bit terrifying compared to say the VR guide, Buffalo or even P****o. But that is how high loft powershield tends to work out.


Rab Baltoro Guide Pro has some sort of high loft Powershield, weighs the same as the TNF jacket, and you can get it for £200 without much hunting around. Been out for a year or so. Presumably there are some other benefits to whatever flavour of Powershield this thing uses, but the marketers don't seem to have told anyone yet.
15/03/2012 at 20:30

Well that RAB thing is even powershield pro(!). Pattaguici's near equivalent was 350. Dead bird do seem to have a straight high loft powershield hoody at 295.

Guess that all the VR/Extreme stuff (mostly fairly UK specific?!) must help keep the prices for this sort of thing under control from UK brands.

Actually I'm a tiny bit sceptical about the 25% thing - the fleece is going to be about half the net fabric weight at most so you're looking at requiring quite a steep improvement.

16/03/2012 at 12:54

> Actually I'm a tiny bit sceptical about the 25% thing - the fleece is going to be about half the net fabric weight at most so you're looking at requiring quite a steep improvement.

Article says 25% lighter fabric, so the required increase in thermal efficiency (warmth for weight) is 125/75 = 1.66, aka 66% improvement over existing.  Which does look pretty impressive, if they have really achieved it.

27/03/2012 at 11:50
£280!
Your say
email image
7 messages
Forum Jump  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter
Sign up to our twitter feed

Promotions