New camera. Oooh, look it has a 'starlight' setting, whats that about then?...

13 messages
23/01/2012 at 23:58

Had to go out for a late night walk and find out! 
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ukjeeper/sets/72157629004177597/

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7149/6751664039_ef93e286c1_b.jpg
24/01/2012 at 08:16

I just got the TZ18, but not had a chance to try this setting yet.In fact hardly used it last weekend.

I assume it was with a tripod of some sort

Edited: 24/01/2012 at 08:17
24/01/2012 at 08:24
Oh, definitely tripod! Starlight has the option for 15, 30 or 60 seconds when you select it. I went for 60 seconds. Which 2 mins. 1 to take the pic, 1 to process. There's a countdown on the screen so you know when its done.

Dog thought i was mental as we kept stopping to point a funny shaped box with legs at the sky...
Edited: 24/01/2012 at 08:25
24/01/2012 at 09:13

I'm in the same boat... with a new camera that does so many things that I'll never get to the end of all its menu options. Some of what it does could be useful, but some things are just plain weird....

* It has a 'smile recognition' setting, enabling it to take a picture only when the subject is smiling. I'm not sure how practical this is for landscapes. The weather has been pretty lousy since I got the camera, so the landscape just keeps scowling!

* It takes colour or black and white pictures... and in the black and white mode you can select spot colours, such as red, blue, yellow or green. If you have someone wearing a red jacket, you can keep the red jacket and have the landscape black and white. Or even have a black and white landscape with blue sky!

* Its low-light capabilities are incredible, and its ISO settings are remarkably high. The camera can 'see' stuff in the dark that I can't see at all. I can only assume it was programmed with lots of carrot extract!

* It does movies as well... even coping with an OM Mini Meet.

24/01/2012 at 14:32

I think you did really well with the video clips Paddy, when I tried it with a small camera holding it by hand it was quiet jerky, next time I used a tripod and it was a lot better.

I tried to take photos of the stars last year and couldnt get it right, I tried   the manual focus (as suggested but still couldnt get it right ) I was using a tripod, perhaps I'll do better this year .

24/01/2012 at 14:45
All I can say it that it also has anti-shake (and maybe even anti-earthquake) settings.
24/01/2012 at 15:07
My zoom camera has anti-shake but the original clip was taken with a smaller camera, I think I'll take my tripod ( as its for views ) just to be sure as I wouldnt like to have to walk for hours to get there and find it looked as if I had been standing on top of  a spin drier.
24/01/2012 at 19:35

A few years ago I sat shivering on a bench, while my camera sat stable on a tripod, to get pictures of a lunar eclipse. Wish I'd had my current camera for that.

http://s4.outdoorsmagic.com/members/images/15789/gallery/moon_0.jpg?width=350&height=273

Pulling back, this is what the moon looked like when compared to my local hill and monument - Hoad Hill and Sir John Barrow Monument.

http://www.outdoorsmagic.com/members/images/15789/Gallery/Hoad_0.jpg


A few years earlier, I'd sat in almost the same place to watch the sun rise partially eclipsed.

http://s3.outdoorsmagic.com/members/images/15789/gallery/eclipse_0.jpg?width=217&height=350


Meanwhile... does anyone have enough of a view of the sky to spot the predicted Aurora Borealis that's possibly going to flare up this evening due to the recent solar flare?
Edited: 24/01/2012 at 19:37
24/01/2012 at 19:54
Haway then Paddy - what's the camera?
24/01/2012 at 20:13

I'm looking forward to my TZ18 and it looks like my little tripod will see some action soon!

24/01/2012 at 20:25
Rosswm... I was using a Canon 350D... now I'm using a Sony NEX 5.
25/01/2012 at 10:09
Looking at my pictures again, i'm thinking a 60 second exposure was way too long. The stars have moved. Any suggestions as to the best exposure time to allow enough light to be captured while still leaving the stars where they are? Or should is it just trial and error?
25/01/2012 at 10:23

Nice photos Paddy

I like your sky photos UKJ, I have a job getting my camera to see stars, as its windy in this area quiet a lot it tends to move you or the camera even with a tripod .

Your say
email image
13 messages
Forum Jump  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter
Sign up to our twitter feed

Promotions