Osprey Atmos 50- for winter use?

Has anyone ever tried one of these for lugging winter stuff about?

17 messages
14/09/2008 at 15:17
I'm in a bit of a conundrum at the moment as I am looking for a winter day sack. I already have an old Karrimor hot route 50, which is fantastic for chucking lots of heavy gear inside and lugging it to the crag or up a mountain in winter.
However I have in recent years become addicted to my hydration bladder would be useless unless I cut holes in the pack.

Scratching my head I remembered that I also have an Osprey Atmos 50, but then I would worry that the lightweight fabric might struggle with all that extra kit.
Has anyone used the Osprey Atmos 50 for winter stuff and how did it cope?
If it is totally unsuitable can anyone recommend a good winter sack 45-55 L that is hydration compatible?

Thanks

Jerome
14/09/2008 at 15:40

Hi Jerome.

I'm not an Osprey fan myself but I know folk who've used the Atmos 35 as a winter daysack, and also the Talon 33 (there is a 44 model) perfectly successfully.

My own choice in that sort of capacity would be the POD Black Ice (comfortable and bomb-proof and available in different back lengths). Or I'd look at the larger OMM models like the Villain or Mountain Mover - but they only come in a single back length (and it doesn't fit me!), plus I think they're thin on the ground right now until new stock hits the shops.

Whatever though, make sure you try it on fully loaded - packs are almost as individual as boots when it comes to fit.

Edited: 14/09/2008 at 15:41
14/09/2008 at 15:51

I dont know the Atmos, but the Kestral 48 works remarkably well. Side pockets I can get into on the move. Hip belt pockets for compass/buff/treats/etc. Hydration sleeve between the back and bag. Two sizes, adjustable to fit. Only downside is the weight of the extras, but I find it so comfortable and easy to shift weight around between my hips and shoulders as needed it seems to disappear - till next time I need to heave it back on!

14/09/2008 at 19:42

Hi Jerome
I use the Aura 35 (female version of Atmos) as a winter daysack, and took my Aura 50 on the OM Winter Skills course, both years. The 50 took all the winter stuff, incl. crampons, harness, helmet, ice-axe, assorted bits of hardware, flask etc. etc. etc. with no problem and was very comfortable. I certainly didn't feel it couldn't cope with the weight of the kit. The compression straps on the 50 mean you can squidge it down quite a lot if you're just doing a winter day-walk rather than serious stuff you'd need hardwear for.

Edited: 14/09/2008 at 19:43
14/09/2008 at 19:49

I tend to use an OMM 32L Classic which is lightweight and takes my winter kit (but not a rack) with ease. For something a little bigger (a whole 3 liters) I have used my Crux AK37 (big) L - if that is not enough the AK47 (my winter backpacking sack) is great.

Yet as said above - fit is all.

14/09/2008 at 23:00

My friends uses his Atmos 50, however, the problem he finds is that with all the winter gear in, the load can be quite far away from the back. Meaning your put off balance, which may not turn out so well. The best winter pack i have seen/had is the osprey exposure 50.

It is a absolute dream, custom moulded hip belt, nice comfy back system, aswell as being pretty bomb proof. I cannot fault it what so ever, that would be my recogmendation! 

15/09/2008 at 15:59

Hello Half Viking / Jerome Conreen et al.,

 Many thanks for all the interest in Osprey packs.

If I'm honest, I wouldn't suggest the Atmos 50 to be the most perfect pack for full-on winter adventures or winter climbing / mountaineering etc, as the Atmos series is designed to be a lightweight, fully-ventilated pack for the high-end trekker / walker / light mountain user who is looking to save every gram more than scale the north face of the Ben etc!

It could be said that using a ventilated pack (where the load is purposefully held away from the body) could potentially be detrimental to balance etc. whilst climbing, however this is a very subjective issue and not one I'm about to take a hardline stance on! I am however going to steer your attention towards our new climbing / alpine packs, the Mutant 38 and the Variant series, as possible solutions to the original question of recommending packs for winter use.

The Mutant 38 is a dedicated climbing pack design for all-round 'vertical' and mountain use, being equally at home summer scrambling in Scotland / the Alps, to cold winter climbs in Alaska. With it's floating lid, the Mutant 38 will comfortably swallow ~another 8 to 10 litres of gear (for when you need that extra fleece or rack of gear!) and includes climbing-specific design features such as a reverse-wrap hipbelt, 3-point haul loops and a gear-racking system on the hipbelt.

Alternatively the new Osprey Variant series comes in three sizes (28, 37 & 52ltrs) and could be considered to be the most direct 'replacement' for the Exposure series, in that the Variant packs are vey winter-focussed climbing packs. With crampon pouches, ski-loops and fixtures for modern modular ice-tools, the Variant packs would be another good possibility for a winter-specific pack.

I would definitely recommend the above packs for winter / climbing use over-and-above the Atmos 50. For more info on the above packs, feel free to visit the Osprey website at www.ospreypacks.com. You could also take a look at the link below which is a recent review for the Mutant 38 by Jon Doran right here on OM:

 http://www.outdoorsmagic.com/news/article/mps/uan/5500

I hope the above info is useful!

Thanks guys,

Martin

Osprey Packs

21/09/2008 at 23:35

Thanks for the responses.  Had a look at some packs this weekend in Betws-y-Coed and Llanberis.  The Mutant looks like a good pack but is not quite big enough.

Matt, Pod stuff is very well built but I'm not sure if I can use my hydration bladder.

 I will certainly check out the OMM stuff and the new Osprey Varient series when I see them in the shops.

Thanks Again

Jerome

Edited: 21/09/2008 at 23:37
23/09/2008 at 11:37
I used the Atmos 50 for a weeks hike around the lakes last December, it coped brilliant, the lightweight fabric just stretches unimaginably to accommodate whatever you chuck at it and it hasn't a stretch mark or rip anywhere! Well worth it!
23/09/2008 at 11:53

However I have in recent years become addicted to my hydration bladder would be useless unless I cut holes in the pack.

No: stow the bladder against the back, outside of your internal liner just in case there's a leak, and loop the hose out of the top of the snowlock and down over the shoulder.  There's no need for special holes or pockets to use a bladder: I've used them with no bother on packs that aren't "hydration enabled".

Pete.

23/09/2008 at 15:54
 
Jerome Conreen wrote (see)

Matt, Pod stuff is very well built but I'm not sure if I can use my hydration bladder.

 
I had a Platypus before bags were designed to be "hydration compatible", amazingly enough it works just as well if you just plonk it down the back of your bag and snake the hose out of the lid. Never had a problem using it like that in the past, so I wouldn't worry about that if that's all that's stopping you getting a Pod bag.
23/09/2008 at 16:35
Actually, Chris, if he's prepared to do that Jerome'd be well advised to stick with his Karrimor Hot Route. Classic bags. I've still got a 1994 Hot Earth on the go and unless his needs replacing for other reasons, I'd say 'if it ain't broke....'
23/09/2008 at 20:58
Jerome, just for your information, a majority of the Podsacs are hydration compatible.
23/09/2008 at 23:03
Yes, my POD Black Ice certainly is.
23/09/2008 at 23:09
What's the back system on the POD Matt? Is it rigid?

 

24/09/2008 at 08:53
Its generally a removable frame sheet with one or two removable aluminium staves. The lighter 'thin ice' has no back system at all (just foam)
24/09/2008 at 12:39
Yep, there's some very thin padding on the ouside of the back, and then a removable framesheet with a single, malleable alloy stay inside. The hipbelt is removable too if you want (designed for stripping down for climbing). Oh, and so is the lid.
Your say
email image
17 messages
Forum Jump  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter
Sign up to our twitter feed

Promotions