Socks: do you wear one pair or two?

1 to 20 of 37 messages
16/04/2010 at 12:02

When I'm wearing my boots I've always simply put my walking socks over the top of my ordinary socks and thought nothing of it, until last weekend when someone looked at me in astonishment as I was doing it!

Now I'm a bit confused. Have I been doing it wrong all these years? Surely not, as it doesn't seem to have done any harm. Is it just down to personal preference? What are the advantages one way or the other and what do you guys do?

16/04/2010 at 12:15
For me,it feels so much more comfortable wearing a thicker pair of socks over a thin liner sock
16/04/2010 at 12:35

strangely enough... just yesterday someone pulled an oh-my-gawd face at my double pair - i do exactly the same:  normal thin socks and thicker walking socks over the top.  I've always done it like that too - and i barely ever get blisters as the friction seems to be minimised.

this, of course, is lovely and cosy in winter, but in summer it can get a bit hot.  fortunately, summers are often so dire that i'm prepared to put up with hot feet on the few occasions it's still and sunny on the summits for the benefit of not limping down with blisters.

and it's a great excuse for stopping to paddle in every other stream

16/04/2010 at 12:38

Whats right or wrong? If you've been doing it for years and it's not given you any grief then there's nowt wrong with it. Personally I wear one pair of thick socks but that's just what suits me.

If the socks you're wearing underneath are cotton then you might gain a bit of comfort by changing to using a liner sock (or thin wool socks).

Edited: 16/04/2010 at 12:40
16/04/2010 at 12:55
I used to use two pairs when boots were generally heavy, rigid and took about two years to start taking on the shape of my feet, but don't find it gives much benefit with more padded modern boots, much less approach shoes.
16/04/2010 at 13:07

In my old winter leathers I wear two because back when I bought them over 20 years ago I thought you needed two pairs of socks and sized them for two.  But every pair I've had subseuqnetly I've worn with one [high quality] pair.  Enough padding, much less sweat.

In sandals I usually wear none.

Pete.

16/04/2010 at 14:27
i used to wear two pairs of socks to counter hot spots and blisters. since finding socks that fit me properly i don't need to anymore. no more blisters.
i wear two pairs when i revert back to the socks that don't fit me properly.
16/04/2010 at 14:33
Erm...  I wear three at times (ducks).  Much of my stuff is in cold places and I have cold feet.  I use a thick pair and a medium pair, and quite often a liner pair - thicker in winter, thinner in summer.  Suits me well and is very comfortable.  But if I was to purchase a new pair of boots for summer use, I'd go for a thick pair and a liner.  In fact I did this last year, a pair of goretex fabric/leather boots for my Balkans cycling/walking trip.  Worked fine, and suprisingly accomodating with just a thin liner pair or even two pairs of thicker socks in the cooler eves.  Wouldn't walk with two thick pairs in them tho.
16/04/2010 at 17:57

Liner socks and loop stitched wool over those, never have blisters, my standard boots are 3 (ish) season Meindl's, un-fashionably leather but very comfortable in all weathers.

Steve D

16/04/2010 at 18:52

Just the one pair for me - depending on footwear and season they can be any model of Smartwool from the Adrenalines through to the really thick Expedition ones.

The only exception is when a pair of Rocky Goretex socks go over the top....

16/04/2010 at 19:37
Do you wear 2 pairs of socks in your 'work' shoes that you wear all day?

 

16/04/2010 at 19:38
Normally one for me one at the moment too. But then it'd be a bit a touch odd to wear two pairs in trail shoes
16/04/2010 at 19:48

one pair normally

sring/autumn either smartwool or bridgedale - large though my shoes are size12 -  tight socks=less chance of blisters IME. 

If  warm I often wear 100% thin nylon (or nylon/wool mix) HJ 'indestructable' socks - surprisingly not smelly   (I wear a synthetic baselayer so prob wouldn't notice anyway)

in winter I sometimes add  liners if wearing the AKU fabric n leather  boots and it's cold

or if trail shoes - sealskins socks on top of smartwools

16/04/2010 at 20:16

I've worn two pairs in my combats before now when they (as someone has already touched on) just don't want to conform to your feet. It helps to 'cavity fill' and keep them comfortable and subdues the blister monster. If that's your preference follow the advice already given on this thread. I, however, having had the good fortune of some great fitting boots recently (mainly combats) and have found that a nice thick pair of coolmax socks on their own have vastly improved my walking experience (not sure of their brand..got them for chrimble). Stiff soled rigid boots with two pairs of socks seems like a nightmare to me now..My lowas with a single pair of socks allows for better feedback from the terrain to my feet, keeps them warm in winter, and comfy in summer.

16/04/2010 at 21:36
I used to always wear two pairs, no however i wear one.
16/04/2010 at 21:54

 Two pairs ,unless i am going more than ten miles or so ,but then i'll wear a double layer sock which is more comfy over time .

 The double layer socks were £7.50 for 2 pairs from ASDA. Best fit i've found .

16/04/2010 at 21:57
Two pairs? I'm not a fecking horse!
16/04/2010 at 22:08
Always two paris, one being a liner sock.
16/04/2010 at 22:54
Glad to see i've sparked some debate! To be honest I mostly wondered if I was missing out on some obvious benefits but it doesn't sound like it, other than maybe cooler feet.

I have another habit which tends to attract more attention anyway. Because I'm cursed with thin ankles it's impossible to find boots where the tops don't rub back and forth across my leg as I walk which causes a suprising amount of pain in the end, so I found a solution...

Wrist bands! The 80's style sports ones. I put them on over the top of my socks so they're level with the top of the boots and job done - no more rubbing. I'm willing to concede that it does look rather odd though!
Edited: 16/04/2010 at 22:55
16/04/2010 at 22:56
you mean charmingly retro-eighties, surely?
1 to 20 of 37 messages
Forum Jump  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter
Sign up to our twitter feed

Promotions