Non-Shell Revelation

Ditching G-Tex

1 to 20 of 38 messages
12/11/2007 at 13:31

Was out at the weekend up Glen Lyon giving the Montane Extreme smock it's first winter outing (well late autumn).  Though it was a bit too mild for the jacket it was still a revelation.  I've TX-Directed it and after an hour of constant rain (wet enough to need waterproof trousers) the rain was still beading off and I was totally dry.  And what a great hood.

It got one outing last winter with a Blacks wicking top underneath - big mistake.  I wore it next to the skin this time - fantastic and warm to touch.

In the bag was a Paramo Torres for lunch stops (turned out to be too small so is going on Ebay) and a Paramo Aspira for constant rain (it was a gear testing trip really). 

Well the Torres came out of the bag for the lunch stop - though wasn't really needed, and though warm, it came up too small on the arms and too short over the smock - so it's off to Ebay for that one.  The Aspira may take it's place as the Belay Jacket or I might get a Buffalo Alpine or Hooded Belay.

Essentially though I was warmer and drier thank my friend in his XCR.  He kept the g-tex on due to the 70mph wind.

I'm now considering a revamp of my gear along the lines of:

Winter:

Montane Extreme Smock (TX-Directed) + Paramo Fuera Smock (TX-Directed) + overlayer Buffalo Alpine/Belay

Summer 

Montane smartwool t-shirt +  Fleece (Paramo hoodie?)+ Paramo Aspira

Anyone see any flaws in this idea?  Or have opinions?

12/11/2007 at 13:44
You may find the Aspira too warm for the summer. I ditch Paramo shells when it's warm and either take a TX-10ed Fuera smock if it looks dry (for wind and showers) or a Montane 200 if it looks like rain cos it's tiny and light as I hate wearing proper waterproofs and refuse to carry heavy stuff around.
12/11/2007 at 13:45

sounds good ts. i assume you just tx'd the outside of the extreme?

i've thought about just wering it next to the skin but isn't that inconvenient in the pub, or is it a quick toilet visit to change?

12/11/2007 at 13:56
I find pile/pertex or vapour rise stuff is great until it really chucks it down. My mate tried to stick it out in heavy rain in a vapour rise in the rain the other day. He was soaked within 30 mins and miserable. I was warm and dry in my paramo top. I would definitely hang on to the aspira.
12/11/2007 at 14:10

Pretty much echoing what NPC and Ben say...

I abandoned Paramo waterproof stuff as  I found it far too hot inSpring and Autumn most of the time, let alone summer, but there again I'd have boiled alive in a Montane Extreme if I'd had it on this weekend, so maybe you'd get away with it.

And while soft shell stuff, especially when freshly proofed, will see off the worst, it will let water in under prolonged heavy fire, even when it seems to be beading.  With something like the Extreme, the pile layer will soak up a lot before you really notice the water has got through the outer layer.

Your winter suggestion of two soft shells seems a bit odd: why not just use a Paramo waterproof (which is as breathable as a soft shell, but fully waterproof) with suitable layering underneath to keep warrm?

Pete.

12/11/2007 at 14:42
Pile's funny stuff, water tends to just run out of it, so in anything other than massively heavy persistent rain, it's not going to hold liquid close to the skin.

OutdoorsMagic Editor | jon@outdoorsmagic.com 

12/11/2007 at 14:54

PC - the idea of the two windshells was that the fuera is pretty waterproof so combined with the Extreme's TX-ing it would be good enough. I think though you're right and the Aspira on top of the Extreme would do the job better. I may still take an extra layer - but suspect this will just be until I have the confidence to start leaving it out of the bag.

Parky - I just chucked it in the machine with tx-direct wash-in and it seems to have done the trick fine. Yeah it looked a bit poo in the pub, but a jumper in the car would solve that.

I suspect in summer the Aspira will be next to my skin. I got a Medium as it's more fitted - but will send off to Paramo who can apparently add several inches to the arms.

Of course the other wintering option would be to ditch the Torres (which is hapening anyway) and use the Aspira (maybe with t-shirt/cambia) for wet/general use and use the Montane Extreme for Belay duty.

I think I have too much gear.... still nice to have no room for a g-tex though

Edited: 12/11/2007 at 14:55
JCM
12/11/2007 at 16:24

If you washed the Extreme in direct wash in would you not effectively be 'proofing' the pile as well as the pertex?  Isn't this against perceived wisdom or is the thing to be doing, only asking as I've just picked up a second hand bargain Extreme and was thinking of using Direct spray on the pertex outer only?

12/11/2007 at 17:02

In theory yes.  In practice it either had no effect or a positive effect.

"is the thing to be doing?" -  good question

12/11/2007 at 17:39
ah, a man after my own heart. just do the lot and see what happens. the pile is supposed to wick but as i always wear a baselayer benath i've never noticed the difference. i think i prefer trying to dissuade wet comin in.
12/11/2007 at 18:29
> i think i prefer trying to dissuade wet comin in.

I suspect you ought to get the anti-Paramo effect; proofed pile causes 'pump liner' action, only pumping towards the body. Granted, the water has to get through the pile face first.

I can see an experiment coming on with a pile sample and some TxDirect...
12/11/2007 at 21:54
not sure with pile as it's not as closely woven as paramo. talking of experiments...i have a mountain top i can experiment with. proof & turn inside out under a fuera. in fact i'll start that now...that'll impress the neighbours.
12/11/2007 at 22:06

Not sure why it would wick backwards - there will always be a heat/pressure differential pushing the moisture away from the skin. 

I doubt it's really possible to waterproof pile anyway - the surface tension will break down at the first rub. 

Certainly worth an experiment.

13/11/2007 at 11:07

PC - the idea of the two windshells was that the fuera is pretty waterproof so combined with the Extreme's TX-ing it would be good enough. I think though you're right and the Aspira on top of the Extreme would do the job better. I may still take an extra layer - but suspect this will just be until I have the confidence to start leaving it out of the bag.

An Aspira and an Extreme smock!  Bloody hell, you must run incredibly cold!  That combination isn't far off a down jacket for warmth and while a downie is great for standing around it's not something I like to do anything active in unless it's really cold, and if it's that cold then it won't be raining.

Beyond that I suspect what might happen is that after a while the top layer will wet out and then cling to the top of the next one, and a clinging wet surface won't allow the water to bead up and run off so it will soak through that too.  Paramo stuff works by having a dedicated pump liner that is not bonded to the outer: if you could get away with two layers of the outer (soft) shell then Paramo would be selling it to you already as waterproof, because the most common criticisms of their kit are it's too hot, too heavy and too bulky, and you'd get around all three by taking this approach.

 Back to layering, I am reminded of Buffalo 's claims for the Mountain Shirt, that it replaces 4 conventional layers.  Well, it does, but if you only want to replace one or two of them at any one point in time you're a bit snookered as the vents will only do so much.  Hacking up a big snow slope in the sun is hard, hot work, and with a minimum of an Aspira smock I'd find it pretty ugly going.  Even with a downie in the bag for standing about, I'm often down to a base layer in snow conditions. 

Pete. 

13/11/2007 at 12:36
> Not sure why it would wick backwards

The same way Paramo wicks outwards; capillary depression. This causes water to 'unwick'; rather than be drawn into increasingly small gaps between fibres (wicking), it is forced the other way because the fibres are proofed.
13/11/2007 at 13:14

All sounds fair.

Thanks for the comments they're giving me the confidence to ditch a layer. I think my problem is that I've always been so cold/wet with g-tex that I have tended to take extra layers to change into or overlayer.

As I seem to be so much dryer with these combos. then less layers should be needed. I think that sounds a bit like the Paramo advert actually...

One Paramo Torres medium for sale - too small/not needed.... worn once...!

I'm veering towards:

winter wet day

Aspira as main jacket with or without base layer dep. on temperature and with Montane Extreme as a Belay Jacket.

winter dry day

Extreme smock on the base with Aspira for Belay duties only. No other layers!

Summer

T-shirt, Aspira and maybe Cambia Hoody in various combinations. Probably Aspira next to skin if too warm.

NB - I am a very cold person though get very sweaty when warm - hence the switch from g-tex.

Problem is I'm coming back to the old dilemma of do I really need the Extreme smock if the Paramo does the same thing and If I get a belay jacket that will suit summer and winter....

Edited: 13/11/2007 at 13:16
13/11/2007 at 16:22
How much for Torres?
13/11/2007 at 18:54

I agree with your last comment!  If you use both the Aspira and the Extreme as belay jackets you are going to have to buy both in an over-large size.  Try using the Aspira all the time and look for an over-jacket that is perhaps lighter and more packable than the Extreme.  Or maybe a jacket that is just dead cheap, like a ski jacket from Decathalon, or a TKMaxx reject?

14/11/2007 at 10:06

Wallace - you can have it for £55 posted?

14/11/2007 at 10:37

Problem is I'm coming back to the old dilemma of do I really need the Extreme smock if the Paramo does the same thing and If I get a belay jacket that will suit summer and winter....

The Aspira could reasonably be said to do similar duty to something like the Duality smock or a Buffalo Teclite shirt as far as insulation goes, but it's much cooler than an Extreme.  I'd agree with David that sizing the Aspira and Extreme to go over one another will mean they're a bit over-chunky for using on their own.

For a belay jacket I'd get something that's designed to pack away fairly small, like a Primaloft jacket that will weigh and bulk less than fibre-pile or fleece for the same insulation.  The Aspira is designed for wearing all the time so I'd use it that way and not worry about it as a belay layer.

Pete. 

1 to 20 of 38 messages
Forum Jump  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter
Sign up to our twitter feed

Promotions