Soft shell and hard shell

Both or one?

1 to 20 of 22 messages
22/08/2007 at 11:50

I've been pondering for a while about purchasing a soft shell as I'm a bit of a sweaty lad and find my hard shell ends up soaked if I don't work with it during a walk. Reading all the reviews, it sounds like I might be better off going for a more breathable soft shell but I'm not sure how much total protection it will provide. 

So with that in mind, my question is for people with soft shell's; "do you take a hard shell out for full waterproof protection or do you find that the soft shell is good enough as your outer layer?"

I like to be covered for all eventualities and wondered if I could rely on the soft shell  during a heavy down pour or would you still suggest I still carry a lightweight hard shell?

Thanks,

T  

22/08/2007 at 12:16
I  reckon most 'soft shells' are just a marketing ploy. They are a halfway-house between insulation(a fleece?) and waterproof(gtx, event etc). Jack of all trades, master of none. They can be fine in dry, cold weather (not Scotland) but steady rain will have you reaching for a 'proper' waterproof. My preference is for a lightweight fleece/ pertex windproof/ lightweight 'hardshell' combo in summer. Much more flexible. If it's warm rain i often don't bother putting on a shell. In colder weather and strong wind i'll take a heavier shell, and in winter, Paramo.

 

MoS
22/08/2007 at 13:00
Agree with Mike in that 'soft shells' are better in cold dry rather than cold wet climates, but Paramo (regarded by some as the original soft shell) being the exception - ideal for cold wet weather.
That said I love my soft shell trousers for winter - made of polartec powershield, they're breathable but wind and water resistant.  Just how much rain they will shed depends on how recently I've reproofed them, but newly done I can get away with several hours of all but the heaviest rain.  I always carry waterproof trousers just in case, but rarely need them.  If it's really p!ssing it down I'd wear Paramo Cascadas from the outset but the soft shells tend to win because they're more comfy and they look nicer
I did buy a jacket made of the same fabric, perhaps swayed by a review on here which described it as 'sex on a coathanger', lol - this bit probably belongs on the 'worst piece of kit you've owned' thread.  It's a beautiful jacket, but I've only ever worn it down the pub.  For me, 'soft shell' jackets don't fit with my needs and I'd always opt for Paramo in cool weather when it threatens rain as I know I only need the one jacket.
So it might be worth taking a look at Paramo, Tony, certainly very breathable and you don't need an extra shell as back up.  Some will say too warm though
Edited: 22/08/2007 at 13:02
MoS
22/08/2007 at 13:08

Sorry to continue the trend but I agree... I use paramo between october and may which is in effect as breathable as a softshell (non-membraned) but also waterproof. My 'softshell' (a rab VR) hardly gets a look in, as the paramo is just as warm and breathable, but more water resistant.

In summer I wear a windproof (paramo fuera smock) most of the time and only carry a waterproof if its wet from the off.

Edited: 22/08/2007 at 13:09
22/08/2007 at 13:14
Soft Shells are great! I have a Rab Vapour Rise jacket, and read revies on it, no one is dissapointed! Its pretty good against the weather, will keep you dry in rain for a decent ammount of time, is wind resistant (meaning nice and breathable) and provides a bit of warmth but not too much. If it does end up gettign wet it dried really fast too. In conbination with the vapour rise I carry my 400g Super Dru eVENT jacket which is fully protective but pretty light, meaning my upper clothing totals about 1100g. As you dont need a base layer untill it gets really cold. For excelent breathability when conditions are good to light rain ,and then I also have the option of fully protective if it gets any worse. It works well for me anyway.
22/08/2007 at 13:25
Thanks, I'll take a look at the paramos and see if that's their the answer.
22/08/2007 at 13:26

Hmm, I guess it all depends what you think a soft-shell is...

I agree with everything that's been said about Paramo, I too use it from about October to May.

I've never gone for the 'soft-shell' hype, certainly not the membrane soft-shells. I have a pair of lowe Alpine soft-shell trousers which are stretchy and great for winter mountain-biking, but I've never walked in them.

And I have a Rab Vapour Rise top which is great but I don't think of it as soft-shell, to me it's a lined-windproof (I had a similar thing from Patagonia years before the words 'soft' and 'shell' were put together) and I treat it as a mid layer but yes, it's windproof, defects a light shower and saves me reaching for the waterproof on many occasions. But I'd never go out without a light waterproof and rely solely on the Vapour Rise top.

22/08/2007 at 13:28
i'm another in mike's camp. fleece/pertex or paramo for colder times.
22/08/2007 at 13:55

"In summer I wear a windproof (paramo fuera smock) most of the time and only carry a waterproof if its wet from the off."

 Ben, do you find the fuera to be waterproof enough for summer use? I've not used it in a downpour yet and would hate to be out in the boonies only for it to let in water. I still carry a hardshell wetproof but would love to ditch it for summer use.

22/08/2007 at 14:14

To me, the notion of softshell makes more sense for the legs than the body. Putting on and removing waterproof trousers, especially in heavy boots (or crampons) is a big fat hassle. My legs rarely get that cold unless I am sitting doing nothing, and they don't care too much about getting damp either provided they'll dry fast when the rain stops. So I have a pair of Schoeller 3xDry trousers but have yet to put them through their paces. My wife runs a lot colder than me, and she uses trousers in a very similar fabric to good effect.

If you are going to call an insulated pertex (a là Buffalo) a softshell, then these are useful. I have the Rab Berber Tech Smock from the late 90's and it gets a lot of use in cold weather. The Rab VR is a lighter version of the same concept for more year-round conditions and looks pretty darn good to me too.

And Paramo or Furtech offer the most waterproof version of this concept. I wouldn't bother with the Windstopper or other membrane fleeces as they are just heavy and not very effective.

22/08/2007 at 17:35

Mike,

I've used the fuera for full days in drizzle and clag and not got wet, but I don't know how it would fare in a full day of rain. I've used it in heavy rain for about an hour, and it was fine, but I'm not sure how it would handle 2 - 3 hours of heavy deluge. It dries out incredibly quickly though!

22/08/2007 at 17:45

I seem to be posting a lot of links to past threads today...

See I'm so confused for my (fairly lengthy) views on the types of soft shells available, and their uses.  There's a list of links to other threads on the second page...  It's 2.5 years old now, but I'd only tweak the comments slightly today.

I have umpteen of the blighters, of all varieties, as I like to try things out.  My favourite for walking is the shelled micropile, of which the Rab VR is currently tops.  For climbing, I prefer a stretch nylon shell, such as Schoeller Dynamic or Dryskin, preferably with an Extreme face fabric. For skiing, I use a shelled micropile, or PowerShield, such as the Patagonia MixMaster.

But, for all the soft shells I have, I still find myself taking a 100 weight fleece and Nikwaxed Pertex shell and a lightweight waterproof in preference to the softshells when I'm walking.

I think soft shell for trousers makes a lot of sense, too; Schoeller Dryskin Extreme seems ideal, as it's comfortable, stretchy and reasonably water resistant, so you can make a pair of trousers that are close cut to stop them flapping about, whilst still allowing unrestricted movement.

If Paramo made one single item that fitted me properly, with sleeves that come down to my wrists and a body that didn't hang like a sack on me, I'd probably use one of them for winter.

Edited: 22/08/2007 at 17:46
22/08/2007 at 17:54
oh, and some other thoughts on stretch nylon-type softshells on Parky's peter storm soft shell and other musings
22/08/2007 at 18:41
22/08/2007 at 18:45
cheers ben (and parky).
27/08/2007 at 20:59

Montane Extreme smock in winter and have never needed a 'proper' waterproof although I still carry a lightweight one.  Montane erm.... pants, what is it called???  Duality smock for the rest of the year but a Lowe Alpine Atom waterproof handy for stops and when it really buckets down.

 I think soft shell jackets look cool...  don't see them fitting my needs unless I am lucky enough to move to the alps!

28/09/2007 at 10:10

personally i think that soft-shell (and bear in mind that i'm talking about 'old skool' soft-shell, rather than membrane soft-shell) is fantastic for UK weather.

 i wear either a Montane Extreme or Buffalo teclite (depending on the temperature) and find that it copes far better than a hardshell - in terms of comfort - with the normal scottish winter mix of cold wind, heavy drizzle, sleet and snow. it doesn't cope well with just persistant rain (persistant sleet and snow is no problem), but then when you have persistant rain you usually have slightly higher temperatures, so wearing a pile lined smock isn't a brilliant idea anyway.

if perstant rain is forecast, or its just not going to be particularly cold, i wear a Paramo Viento, usually just over a merino baselayer.

 my experiences with membranes - both hard and soft-shell - has been pretty unpleasent, after about ten minutes i feel like i'm wearing a wet towel.

28/09/2007 at 14:39

> I did buy a jacket made of the same fabric, perhaps swayed by a review on here which described it as 'sex on a coathanger'

MoS, have you seen this thread?

28/09/2007 at 14:59
John- Was just thinking of your statement about soft-shell trousers making more sense then a jacket. I would disagree with this myself. Legs don’t sweat as much as a torso, so I find myself quite happily wearing my Montane Spectra pants all day, I wont start a walk wearing them if its dry, but if it gets wet I don’t usually bother taking them off. For my upper half though, which sweats an awful lot more, I wear a soft-shell as its great for breathability. So I don’t end up getting cooked. It will also offer good weather resistance in all but the worst rain. Also trousers are more likely to get wet from rubbing on things, which tends to push water through soft shell materials as the DWR is not effective against water being forced in, so when walking in long grass or crossing a stream or something will get the lower legs a bit wet with a soft-shell pant. Whereas in a hard-shell you will be much better off. On the top half though, your unlikely to get wet except in the rain, so a soft-shell is more then adequate nearly all the time yore not wearing a hard-shell. You argue that wearing soft-shell pants keeps your legs a good temperature and if they get wet they will dry once rain stops, but unless you have particularly non-breathable hard-shell pants I have never experienced sweatiness of my legs so I can keep my legs a good temperature and dry at the same time. Sorry if that seems like I'm having a go at you, I'm not at all just cant see the logic in it, I'm sure you have your own reasons though
28/09/2007 at 17:02
Hmmmm... I'd agree with the above in principle, but from experience, I think I might go for softshell trousers.
Earlier in the week I was half-way up Pillar in some strong wind and the sky looked like it was threatening to rain, loads. As it was not yet raining I stuck to my Fuera Smock, which performed well in the conditions but my legs were freezing cold (wearing only shorts) so I put on my Berghaus Deluge overtrousers. My legs didn't feel any hotter or sweatier, but I could tell that I was slowing down.

A little later it got really cold and more threatening and I fancied another layer so put on my waterproof jacket over the fuera smock (a mistake, should have put a fleece UNDER the smock). As it happened, it didn't rain, but once again, wearing a membrane slowed me down. I didn't feel uncomfortably hot and sweaty but for some reason my body seemed to know I was wearing too much.
1 to 20 of 22 messages
Forum Jump  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter
Sign up to our twitter feed

Promotions