B'boom tssss!
Ours are tourers and for my particular needs touring I wouldn't swap mine for anything else I've yet come across. It's more comfortable, has better pilot view, is more comfortable, carries bags better and is more comfortable. The comfort isn't so much for the backside but from no weight on the wrists/arms and no need to look upwards to see where you're going while at the same time not catching the wind like you would in a bolt-upright posture that would similarly take weight off arms and wrists.
The favourite assumption is it must be Terribly Dangerous because being so low you'll be invisible, but I'm higher than, say, a Lotus Elise, and I don't think I've heard anyone criticise those as death traps because of their invisibility. In fact, I tend to notice Elises quite well and the same goes for my 'bent with a pretty clear "WTF Factor" meaning lots of space.
Recumbents are not a functional class of bike which is, I think, a lot of the problem with wider acceptance. People buy racers to race, tourers to tour, folders if they want to fold them, commuters to commute... recumbents do what, exactly? As above, ours are tourers first and foremost, and that's more important than their being recumbents. So if you're in the market for a functional class of bike assess recumbent possibilities for that function alongside more conventional possibilities and if they'll do what you want in budget then audition and see what you think. Auditioning is very important (and another part of the problem for aceptance, there aren't that many dealers) because two different 'bents will probably be far more different than two different uprights. A lot of uprights in the same basic class are pretty much interchangeable aside from the component mix but 'bents can have very different handling.
Round town I much prefer my Moulton TSR or Brom and Roos prefers her hub-geared hybrid, but for touring our particular models suit what we like very well.
Pete.