Mountain bikers

15 messages
27/04/2012 at 10:37
 Dangermouse wrote in the Bradbury thread          ''Considering the struggles that walkers / ramblers went through to gain access to the hills, it amazes me how little sympathy some still have for mountain bikers and other hill users. This is definitely not all walkers, many are not at all bothered as I don't fly past startling people and always act with courtesy. However a select few still want exclusive rights to the fells. Unfortunately a few of these have said they are members of the ramblers association when I have had the odd altercation with them, leaving me with an unfair stereotypical view of the clubs members. I once pointed out the trespass and right to roam argument which totally fell on deaf ears.''                                 Just wondered how other Omers feel about mountain bikers.The countryside code states bikers must give way to walkers  on bridleways which never seems to happen.Many bikers now use footpaths as mountain bike routes .Do Omers think this is Ok?           
27/04/2012 at 10:45
There should, in theory, be enough room for everyone to enjoy doing what they do without causing danger or annoyance to others. On the whole I find mountain bikers to be fine; no issues with the majority who are polite, friendly etc. There is a minority who are anything but polite, friendly etc. As long as the good people outnumber the bad then things should work OK. A few riders seem to think that it's acceptable to hurtle down paths, or bridleways, oblivious to children, animals, the aged or just your average walker. How you alter this attitude; I'm not so sure.
27/04/2012 at 11:28

I agree with Neil. I have never had any bad run ins with them. I even stop, move out of the way and get my dog out of the way so they dont have to stop! I ride as well, though far less than I am out on foot, so know its nice not to stop all the time for people. When Im on the bike I am always friendly and courteous and thank people when they move... I actually find the people on foot to be far less accommodating. Most don't even look or acknowledge you, some just pretend you are not there and just keep walking in the middle of the path. And I am still nice even to them... It just really p*sses me off when they do it on a cycle track where bikes actually have priority!

Rant over

27/04/2012 at 11:54

I agree with Nick - as someone who spends a lot of time walking, running and biking I find that although there are a few aggressive cyclists, they are unusual, whilst a lot of walkers are far more discourteous, they just do it passively - by walking 4 abreast across the full width of a cycle / bridle path, ignoring cyclists bell pinging or walking on one side with a dog on the opposite side on the end of an extending lead.

27/04/2012 at 12:00
I agree with Nick - as someone who spends a lot of time walking, running and biking I find that although there are a few aggressive cyclists, they are unusual, whilst a lot of walkers are far more discourteous, they just do it passively - by walking 4 abreast across the full width of a cycle / bridle path, ignoring cyclists bell pinging or walking on one side with a dog on the opposite side on the end of an extending lead.

Are the walkers, in the case you mention doing anything 'wrong' though? Those on foot/horse have the 'right of way'.......
27/04/2012 at 12:04
No, they are not doing anything wrong according to the law. But I think they have forgotten about how to just get along with everyone rather than antagonise and try to make a point, so I guess they have done something wrong: failed to be nice people! Why do they need to assert their point? I know they have right of way so I don't harase them or pass them at high speed. Surely, in the interest of just being a nice person, it would cost them nothing to walk behind one another or get their dog on the same side as themselves. Being nice to someone usually makes me happy or put me in a good mood, and sometimes getting some kindness from a stranger, or just a smile, is enough to make my day. It doesn't have to be illegal to be wrong.
27/04/2012 at 12:17

>>Are the walkers, in the case you mention doing anything 'wrong' though?

No they are not doing anything 'officially' wrong, just being discourteous,  but "Right of way" on a shared path doesn't mean "exclusivity" - it means that a cyclist should slow down and give them plenty of opportunity to let him past without inconveniencing them, but doesn't mean that they should be obstructing the cyclists route.

>>Those on foot/horse have the 'right of way'.......

In any case, walkers like that are just as likely to be obstructing me when I am walking or running as when I am on a bike, and I'm certain that horse riders would be pretty frustrated with them too. 

27/04/2012 at 12:52

I use a mountain bike and I walk.  Often on the same journey.  My experience has been that the overwhelming majority of bikers are polite and considerate of others using the route.  OK, a few aren't but no group is perfect.

As a cyclist, however, my experience is different.  I really do ride carefully when walkers are about and give ample warning if I'm coming up behind them.  I've been sworn at on many occasions and, last week, had a stone thrown after me [it missed]. I think there's a set of expectations built into certain groups of walkers [and it does seem to be the groups, rather than families/individuals who have most aggression] that say that mountain bikers are always, in some indefinable way, in the wrong.

So, what do we do to shift perceptions?

27/04/2012 at 13:14
As both a walker and cyclist I haven't encountered any aggressive behaviour from walkers. However, many walkers seem to be blissfully unaware of their surroundings. I have often cycled for ages, a few yards behind walkers, trying gently to attract their attention before they notice me.

However, I do have an issue with dogs. People don't seem to understand that "Under close control" means that their dogs should be next to them, not 100 yards away, or on the other side of the track ready to race across in front of you. Don't get me started on owners who think it's acceptable to let their dogs jump up on you or try to eat your sandwiches.

I don't dislike dogs, but I don't want other people's inflicted on me.
27/04/2012 at 14:50

> The countryside code states bikers must give way to walkers  on bridleways which never seems to happen.

How hard is it for you to step aside to allow a bike through?  I assume you'd step aside to let another walker through.

That said, there's no excuse for bikers not taking account of walkers, and it's not acceptable to fly past them unsafely.

> Many bikers now use footpaths as mountain bike routes .Do Omers think this is Ok?

No, it's not acceptable.

I walk, ride, climb, ski, etc...

I posted the following on MtNUK, 03/05/2001:

"So, a plea for consideration on all sides. Walkers: do you step aside on narrow paths for other walkers? Okay, so how hard is it for you to do the same for cyclists? And cyclists, do you slow down to negotiate trees, rocks or sharp corners? Okay, so why not treat walkers the same. Oh and a friendly greeting or thanks for their consideration as you go doesn't damage your 'cred'. You can be bigger than that."

27/04/2012 at 15:25

Here's an admission - I cycle on footpaths when appropriate. By which I mean cycling won't churn the path up, and won't inconvenience others. I usually dismount 20yds from walkers. Always been met with smiles.

As a walker I'm often blissfully unaware of my immediate surroundings - getting lost in the countryside and my thoughts is part of the reason I'm there anyway!

I suspect grumpy walkers would - if they were cyclists - be grumpy cyclists instead.

But yes, some cyclists need a Jolly Good Telling Off. You know the ones I mean - they probably drive white vans by day judging by their cycling style. I wouldn't want to ban cyclists because of the few selfish gits - it's a great pass time, and very healthy. I've got scars to prove it.

Edited: 27/04/2012 at 15:25
27/04/2012 at 16:13

On the whole, most cyclists I come across are polite and courteous and I try to be the same when I'm cycling. You get rude people everywhere unfortunately.

> Many bikers now use footpaths as mountain bike routes .Do Omers think this is Ok?

I believe that using a footpath on a bike invalidates your right of way over the land and so it shouldn't be done. Some footpaths seem large enough to comfortably accomodate both bikes and people so I have sometimes cycled on those. Overall though, especially on non-gravel paths it's not really OK - it's a footpath for a reason.

Edited: 27/04/2012 at 16:14
28/04/2012 at 22:31
I use footpaths to cycle and I also use footpaths to walk. I have no qualms over allowing a cyclist past me when walking. The way I see it, we're both enjoying the same things in life, but it takes a second for me to stop and let them past.

As long as both cyclists and walkers are courteous to each other, I don't see why we need to adhere to certain rules that restrict access for one recreational purpose but allow it for others.

People need to learn to just enjoy the outdoors and stop getting so het up about rules and regulations. They have their place and are there for a reason, but they aren't always the be all and end all.
Edited: 28/04/2012 at 22:37
28/04/2012 at 22:36

I use footpaths to cycle and I also use footpaths to ride my bike.

Simultaneously?

28/04/2012 at 22:38
haha, just noticed that, edited it and then saw that I'd been caught out...
Edited: 28/04/2012 at 22:40
Your say
email image
15 messages
Forum Jump  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter
Sign up to our twitter feed

Promotions