Ever wondered how big brands test their outdoors clothing? Here's how, plus PU under the microscope.
When we popped up to see
Berghaus
for a sneak look at their autumn/winter 2009 range - full report
shortly - we also had a
guided
tour of their in-house testing lab and an interesting
insight into just how outdoor clothing is specced and developed that we
thought you might find interesting.
The reason behind the lab tour is that Berghaus has rebranded its
in-house Aquafoil fabric as 'AQ' for next winter and they wanted to
explain just how it works, which we'll come to in a minute, but more
generally interesting is the way a large outdoor company like Berghaus
makes sure that the fabrics it uses are up to scratch.
This rig tests a
resistance to rubbing...
It works like this: the designer comes up with a fabric brief, say, 'we
making a lightweight alpine shell jacket and need a fabric that's
highly breathable, very light, but tough and smells of menthol'. Okay,
we made the last bit up, but you get the idea.
Next the fabric technologist finds some likely candidates. Probably a
'safe option' and something slight more adventurous. Once the lab gets
sample fabric, testing begins. Rigs assess abrasion resistance,
breathability, waterproofness - hydrostatic head - flex resistance,
colour fastness, tear strength and more.
What's really interesting and shows the thoroughness of the process, is
that the sample fabric is then washed five times in normal detergent
and the tests are repeated to make sure there's no deterioration.
BergBoffin with
breahtability tester, no, it's not a fish tank...
Only once the lab tests have been finished with positive results are
test garments made up - in Berghaus's own workshop - and sent out for
field testing with the legendary Ken Ledward in the Lakes.
Ken hammers his local fells for hours every day in all conditions
putting serious miles on outdoor kit then reporting back on any issues.
It's his job to determine whether fabrics that do well in the lab tests
live up to real life use and that means 200 hours of real hill time on
any test garment.
Only if both the lab and Ken agree does the finished garment see the
light of day with the result, Berghaus hopes, that there are no nasty
surprises in store for their customers. To be honest, it was a real eye
opener to see just how much testing and development goes on behind the
scenes, the only simiar set-ups we've seen are at Gore's bases in
Scotland and Germany and at the Lowe Alpine pack development team HQ in
Kendal.
Here Comes AQ
The other eye opener was a rapid insight into how PU
membranes work. If you're not a gear geek, you might want to switch off
now, go click on the forum or something, but if you are, here's a very
brief run through.
PU layer under a
microscope - hmm, mites?
If you always assumed that PU membranes are created equal and are just
a homogenous smear of PU then you're wrong. The stuff's engineered at a
microscopic level to give the right characteristics for its function.
So for example, a PU layer might be designed to be tacky on the side
that has to stick to the face fabric for maximum adhesion, have a more
porous structure for optimum moisture transfer in the centre then use
an abrasion resistant top coat for, erm, abrasion resistance.
Why do we need breathable
fabrics? Well, during active walking, the body
generates at least 11,500g of perspiration in 24 hours. To cope with
that you
need a combination of breathable fabrics and venting, it says here...
That's all very simplified stuff, but the images of PU at a microscopic
level - looks like those close-ups of dust mites - are fascinating and
underline just how much technology goes into fabrics like AQ. So it's a
lot more complicated than PU-based fabrics simply being hydrophylic and
moving liquid across the structure of the fabric...
So now you know. You can expect to find AQ in AQ2, AQ2.5 and AQ3
versions appearing in the shops come the autumn. And no, microscopic
vapour bugs do not collect water molecules and carry them across the
fabric, it'd be great if they did though...