Gear features
You are looking at: Home : Gear features

Softshell - What Does What?

So what has Marc Almond been up to and more to the point what are the strengths and weaknesses of the three most popular 'soft shell' fabrics?


Posted: 12 August 2003
by Jon

Remember Soft Shell? Whatever did happen to Marc Almond eh? We're going to say hello to a load of soft shell test garments just as soon as we wave goodbye to the savage heat of the northern summer, but if you're considering venturing into the 'soft shell' market place, we thought you might like a quick run down of the three main fabric types out there with a quick take on their pros and cons...


What is Soft Shell

Really it's just a marketing concept. Waterproofs are obvious right? They stop water, but soft shell, it stops water a bit, it either stops wind completely or quite a lot, it usually breathes better than waterproof things and, erm, it's sometimes stretchy for a better, more technical fit.

In the end, the concept isn't that helpful, unless you think of it as a garment that you can wear as an outer shell pretty much any time when it's not really bucketing down. Though having said that, one major brand have been talking quietly about a totally waterproof softshell garment with taped seams... But isn't that just a stretchy waterproof?


Three Types

As far as we can see, leaving aside windproof shells, which we're not counting, there are three different varieties of soft shell fabric commonly available and all have strengths and weaknesses - Schoeller-type fabrics, Polartec's Powershield and Gore Windstopper. There are other non-brand or 'own brand' variants about, but these three seem to be the main contenders.


Schoeller-Type Fabrics - 'You'll Need A Shell More Often'

Schoeller is a Swiss-made family of fabrics that's been around for years, and popular with European alpinists, but's been dragged kicking and squeaking into the soft shell revolution.

It's a tightly knit/polyester nylon fabric that incorporates Lycra for stretch and is available with added bits for enhanced performance. Dryskin Extreme, as used by MHW for example, has Cordura strands to increase abrasion resistance and durability. Dryskin Extreme with 3XDRY as used by Golite, has Coolmax fibres to improve wicking.

It's very breathable and wicks well too. The pay off is that while it cuts out a lot of wind, it's nothing like as wind resistant as either PowerShield or Windstopper, but if your main problem is losing heat rather than maintaining it, it's a great all round choice. It comes with a DWR coating and survives light drizzle without problems.

There's no fleecy lining, so it's not a great insulator, but again, if losing rather than keeping heat is your aim, that's not a problem. The stretch means it's great for mobility.

Schoeller is expensive stuff, but there are similar fabrics, cheaper fabrics available from some manufacturers, notably Berghaus with it's Cordura-based Fastrek Pant, TNF's Apex jacket and Helly Hansen's own brand fabric.

Breathable and stretchy with reasonable wind resistance. Great for dissipating heat.
Significantly less windproof than competitors, less water resistant too.


Polartec Powershield - "Good Compromise'

Powershield is a 98 per-cent windproof fabric which uses a PU membrane to block most wind. It also has a light fleece backing, a tightly woven nylon face and a DWR finish. It also has a fair amount of stretch, though not as much as Schoeller fabrics.

The idea is that the minor sacrifice in windproofing allows enough extra air circulation to significantly increase breathability at the expense of ultimate warmth. We've been using a couple of Powershield garments recently and we'd say that it works - the fabric holds off the worst of the wind, but remains breathable enough even for warmer-running individuals.

Again it's not cheap stuff - the Arc'teryx MX Gamma, for example, is a mind-boggling £250 - but it's an excellent compromise between toughness, breathability and weather protection. It's also available in different weights including a new lightweight version that will be appearing in the GoLite and Sprayway ranges early in 2004.

Particularly good if you find you run too hot for Windstopper, which we do...

Great balance between wind resistance and breathability - that 2 per-cent makes all the difference.
Not as breathable as Schoeller, allows some wind to pass through.


Gore Windstopper - 'Alpine not Fastline'

Windstopper Softshell, you'll be surprised to hear, uses Gore's TPFE Windstopper membrane laminated to a face and scrim fabrics. The membrane is 100 per-cent windproof and effectively waterproof, although since seams aren't taped, it's more highly water resistant.

Comes in different weights and variation from the light N2S versions through to heavier, fleece-lined variations suitable for extreme winter conditions. We've found breathability to be good in high, cold, dry alpine conditions, but if you run on the hot side, you may find it simply too sweaty in the UK's more humid, warmer climate.

Gore say that ultimately their fabric is warmer than Powershield, which is true, but if you're prioritising heat loss rather than heat conservation, that doesn't really matter. If you run cool or mainly in high mountain environments however, you may be better off with Windstopper.

It also has less stretch built-in than either Powershield or Schoeller-type fabrics, which means that the cut and construction - incorporating stretch panels of other fabrics for example - is crucial to mobility.

Totally windproof and highly water resistant
Works better in high alpine conditions than in UK, hot running bods may overheat too easily


And So?

We'll be carrying individual tests once it gets cooler, but which fabric works best for you depends on how hot you run and what conditions you operate in. For general UK and alpine use, we'd say that Powershield is a splendid compromise fabric. Schoeller is also excellent, but not as wind resistant, while Windstopper is 100 per-cent windproof, but effectively hotter as a result. Too hot for some people in UK conditions.


Previous article
Eider Launches Radical New Pack
Next article
Ace Races In Full Swing


TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Related Content


Discuss this story

I thought that the original soft shell was the Double P system, as pioneered by Buffalo: why no mention of it?

Most of the people I know still use it because their garments have lasted the test of time & hence have not got round to need to buy a replacement from one of the newer fabrics. If you go to a Polaris type event it still seems to be the garment of choice...

The Pertex outer fabric was key as it's windproofing was vital in this country where you were going to get wet & needed to protect yourself during those first minutes of drying out from further cooling, plus the fabric is one of the fasted drying fabrics I know (I still use those towels made from it)

What do you think?

Posted: 13/08/2003 at 06:03

I don't really think Buffalo is softshell just a variation on shelled fleece using fibre pile instead of fleece and has no stretch either. More to the point, it's not marketed as soft shell.

I'm also asuming that people are aware of Buffalo and its qualities.

It sort of underlines what a nonsense the whole catgory really is. The fabrics mentioned are the ones being touted as 'soft shell'. I'm not saying pile/Pertex isn't effective, it's a great UK winter combo, just that it's not generally described as soft shell.

I also ignored Patagonia's Regulator kit and Paramo... Stuff like the Patagonia Speed Ascent, which is my winter climbing jacket of choice btw, is really a sort of upmarket Buffalo with a more water resistant outer. It is sold as 'soft shell'. I dunno, there's no right answer because there's no cast iron definition beyond wind and water resistance.

There's a thread somewhere where I asked what people understood by the term 'soft shell' which simply underlines what a confusing thing it is.

Posted: 13/08/2003 at 08:17

I think that stretch may be the big difference, all modern softshell fabrics have stretch, better in a closer fitted product. Also, the application of soft shell is toward more active people, therefore stretch does make more of a difference (be it a subtle one). But before some Paramo or Buffalo officianado shoots me down in flames, no I'm not suggesting that people who use either of these fabrics aren't active.

Posted: 13/08/2003 at 11:07

See more comments...
Talkback: Softshell - What Does What?

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct:


Latest posts