Gear features
You are looking at: Home : Gear features

The Crux Of The Matter

Not one but two interesting new brands from Britain. We go for a short walk with one of the men behind Crux and Lightwave


Posted: 26 June 2002
by Jon

'Lots of people feel that they're being fed a shedload of hype,' says Adam van Lopik one of the two men behind new UK outdoor outfits Crux and Lightwave. 'Gear loaded with lots of features you don't need, actually has a detrimental effect in the outdoors.'

His point is that the cunning gizmos and gadgetry espoused by many top-end manufacturers add weight, bulk, complexity and cost to essentially simple kit and have as much to do with marketing as they so with solving real problems. Do you really need a complex accessory-carrying pocket on the back of your pack or a window in your tent? Is heavier fabric necessarily tougher?

Along with company founder - male - New Zealander Carol McDermott, Adam has a background at Berghaus where he was product manager for the clothing range, so he's no starry-eyed amateur. He's taken a big salary cut though to commit himself to the purist philosophy at the heart of Crux and Lightwave.

Of course philosophy isn't going to keep you dry at night or carry your climbing gear for you, which is why Adam's popped down to the Costa del Bleaklow for a quick yomp across the peat and a chance to tell us about the kit and let us try it briefly.

Packs

Crux produces three packs, all minimalist, lightweight sacs aimed at climbers. It's immediately obvious that there are no silly gimmicks here. The flagship £120 AK50 is a 45-litre climbing pack with a ten-litre lid extension aimed squarely at technical alpinists.

It's all very 'less is more' with the body fabric being a light but extremely tough-feeling PU-coated Keprotec fabic with a 28/72 ratio of Kevlar to Cordura. It promises to be extremely tough and rip and abrasion resistant, though short of a rabid sheep attack, it's hard to tell on Bleaklow.

The AK50's essentially very simple. The only obvious 'features' are twin axe loops, diagonally slanted compression straps and a haul loop. There's an internal 7001-T6 aluminium 8.5mm tube frame for added support when the going gets heavy and a minimalist seamless back system.

If the thinnish, ergonomically curved straps look rather like those on the Berghaus Extrem range of climbing sacks, it's because Carol was involved in their design as well, ditto the minimal but suprisingly effective winged hip-belt. The frame feeds loads directly into the belt for better carrying and there's no mesh in the construction - it attracts snow, so the finish is smooth.

Of course you can't tell much from a quick two-hour hike over the hills, but it is immediately clear that the pack is acceptably comfortable and decently stable with a light-medium load. A choice of three back sizes means you should be able to find one to suit your physique too. It also gleams quality in a quietly understated 'object of desire way', not that purist, functional climbers will care about that of course.

There are currently two other packs in the range, the A50 (£90) - an AK50 but using Dynatec fabric instead of the Kevlar-reinforced option - and the larger A70 expedition sac which weighs a mere 1.35 kg for 70 litres of capacity, 85 litres with the lid extended, which is mad really.

Tents

Crux produces just one tent, the X2 geodesic, which we (ie: Adam) pitched 'somewhere on Bleaklow', though Lightwave - more details later - produce a further three tents but with dozens of possible configurations...

Anyway, if the weight of a full geodesic and the complexity of pitching has always put you off, you have got to check out the X2. It weighs in at just 2.8kg complete - not much more than a Macpac Minaret tunnel - and is devoid of fiddly tensioners and complex additions.

The fly is almost translucent and looks fragile, but uses a 72g/m2 ripstop, high-tenacity nylon which has been silicone-coated on both sides rather than using the normal PU coating. Adam says that the silicone actually enhances the material's tear resistance by not sticking the fibres together meaning they can roll over one another so when you try to tear the material, you're trying to tear a bundle of fibres rather than a single one.

At any rate, it feels tough and I couldn't rip it with my bare hands. It also pitches very simply by geodesic standards. Slot the four colour-coded Easton alloy poles into mesh sleeves and locate the ends into appropriate grommets. There are no tensioners or weird connectors to complicate things, then just throw the flysheet over and secure.

There are some nice design touches - the pegs are jewel-like, square section, machined alloy, that we reckon could double as knitting needles and the guylines are made from Dyneema, making for a light, strong cord that doesn't absord water like nylon guys.

There are two neat closeable vents either side of the front entrance. Inside it's light and roomy with plenty of room to sit up under the flattish roof plus the usual mesh storage pockets. There's only one entrace at the front but storage for one and a half packs under the rear porch accessible from inside the tent. The door has just one, central zip to save weight and simplify, but we can't see that being a problem in use.

If we were looking for a mountain geodesic, the X2 would definitely be high on our list, maybe even at the top. At £375 it's not cheap, but it looks just a bit special.

Lightwave

Alongside Crux, Adam and Carol have also surreptitiously unleashed Lightwave onto the market. While the Crux stuff is aimed mainly at climbers, its sister brand is focussed on trekkers and backpackers.

No gimmicks, but nice pegs just the same...
We didn't have time to look at any of the three Lightwave tents in the flesh, but there are three basic tunnel designs in the range sized as 'compact two-person', 'roomy two-person / compact three-person' and 'roomy three-person'. It's not quite that simple though as you can choose from different permutations of specification for each size.

So, for example, you could opt for an Arctic fly with an extended vestibule or an Arctic heavy duty groundsheet inner, or ultralight poles saving 300 grammes on the lightweight version or heavy duty poles, or a more 'price-aggressive' fly etc, etc, etc...

It's an interesting idea - if a bit baffling at first acquaintance - and means you can 'design' the spec of the tent to suit your intended use and pocket. Plus if the fabrics, material and construction are up to the same standards as Crux, they will definitely be worth checking out. Oh, one last point, a three-man tunnel tent weighing just 3.1 kg... More in the future I'm sure.

The End

'We want to produce really good gear, using good materials and spend money giving consumers a good deal rather than marketing,' says Adam van Lopik. Crux and Lightwave are small acorns right now, but based on what we've seen, they're heading in the right direction and it's good to see a British company with a fresh and interesting approach.

Buy online through Field and Trek - see OM shopping section.

Crux web site

Lightwave web site


Previous article
Five-Peaks Team 'Sets Record'
Next article
Mont Blanc Tunnel Protesters Gassed


Lightwave, Crux
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Related Content

Related Products


Discuss this story

The market & time will tell us, but in the mean time I wonder about these new companies. Nice ideas and everything, but...

What do Crux's packs bring that hasn't already been done? ME's packs and the mentioned Extrem range spring to mind.

Though that tent looks the height of loveliness, as long as they make a green version for normal people.

Lightwave - the splurge on the website is great, but the only products are three rather dull tents. We already have Terra Nova, Ajungilak, Marmot, Macpac, some other Norwegian brand whose name I can't remember, MHW and TNF making tents of that class. Hmmm.

Discuss!

Posted: 26/06/2002 at 21:57

My opinion, fwiw, is that there's always room for more gear manufacturers, especially new, 'avant guard', ones with bright and simple ideas.

Might teach the big boys a lesson and keep things moving.

Posted: 26/06/2002 at 22:31

Agree with Alex here - sorry Dan! The A70 basically fills a niche that hasn't really been properly addressed since Karrimor discontinued it's original Macsac (designed by Alex McIntyre) some years ago - think of a 70l Kimmsac and you get the idea. The Berghaus extrem is the only mainstream rival and their website studiously avoids quoting a weight for it. There is a rapidly increasing market where even bumblies like me can get into really big hills on climbing trips, and this is exactly the kind of pack that's needed on the hill. (POD sacks are great for walk ins but less useful IMHO when climbing as they have quite a high inherent weight and the only way to lose it is to leave lids behind etc). And also if you compare the back system on the A70 to say a Kimmsac it's clear which you would want to carry loads in (unfair comparison I know but hey...). The creative driving force often comes from smaller competing companies (like ME used to be in its younger days) such as Rab, POD, Aigulle, PHD (who were using 800+ fill power down years before Marmot and other american brands "introduced" it to the markt) and Crux should make some waves with their tiny but perfectly formed product range.
Karrimor and Berghaus tend to compete more with each other for the rambler/traveller market share and indeed it's only relatively recently that Berghaus have regained credibilty in their expedition line. The vast majority of their ranges was given over to leisure fleeces and walking jackets, with just a few high class products lurking amidst a mass of identical jackets in various colours.
Remember, Black Diamond was once just a bloke and his shed, like Pete Hutchinson (ME and then PHD) and Pete O'Donovan (POD). I think what Crux's packs bring us that hasn't already been done elsewhere is much less done much better, if you see what I mean...

Posted: 26/06/2002 at 23:25

See more comments...
Talkback: The Crux Of The Matter

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: