Gear news
You are looking at: Home : Gear news

Anti-Offroading Alliance Emerges

A new pressure group of 14 bodies has been formed to press for firmer action by the government to preserve green lanes from damage by 4x4s and trail bikes.


Posted: 13 June 2005
by Jon

Opposition to the unsuitable use of green lanes by motorised vehicles seems to be hardening with the formation of a new group committed to limiting the access of trail bikes and 4x4s to ancient horse and cart tracks.

The new Green Lanes Protection Group (GLPG) is formed by 14 bodies which include the Ramblers Association - long opposed to off roading - the Country Land and Business Association,(CLA), the Green Lanes Environmental Action Movement (GLEAM), the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England (CPRE) and others.

The group was formed to support the government's Natural Environmen and Rural Communities BIll which is passing through Parliament at the moment. Part 6 of the bill is intended to clarify on what basis motorised vehicles can legally use green lanes.

Many of these were originally intended for use by horse and carts and are, say the GLPG, totally unsuitable for motorised vehicles which cause huge ruts and ruin the enjoyment of the routes for walks, cyclists and riders. They also, say the GLPG, hinder farmers and land managers from using the route duing their work.

The new bill will make it harder for offroaders to claim the right to drive on green lanes with the result, say the GLPG, that offroaders have initiated an organised campaign to claim more ancient rights of way as Byways Open to All Traffic (BOATS) before the bill becomes law.

The GLPG would like to see firmer action by the government, but in any case is urging it to adopt the measures in the bill and to 'urgently implement the new legislation to prevent further damage to an important part of our heritage, habitats, landscapes and rural life'.

According to Jacquetta Fewster, Director of Campaigns at the Ramblers' Association: "This legislation is not far-reaching enough. What is needed from this government is tough action now on this destruction of our natural environment. Any delay in implementation will allow hundreds more footpaths to be opened up for motor vehicle use causing irrevocable damage and shattering the peaceful enjoyment of the countryside."

On The Other Hand...

Meanwhile off-roading groups such as the Green Lane Association (GLASS) and the Trail Riders Fellowship (TRF) are complaining that groups such as the Green Lane Environmental Action Group (GLEAM), the Yorkshire Dales Green Lane Alliance (YDGLA) and the Friends of the Ridgeway (FoR) 'continue to stand in the way of effective management of trail riding and driving'.

They believe that ' the continued negative and uncooperative attitude of some anti-vehicle pressure groups is undermining the Government's Framework for Action proposals for the use of mechanically propelled vehicles on rights of way'.

There's a code of conduct on the GLASS web site. If more off roaders actually followed it, then 4x4s might be less unpopular. One item says

'Be courteous to other road users - pull over and stop your vehicle for walkers, but pull over, stop your vehicle and switch off the engine for passing horses. Thank those who move over for you.'

Another reads:

'Travel at a quiet and unobtrusive pace and as slowly as practicable; we recommend a maximum of 12 mph when in a 4x4 and on an Unsurfaced Right of Way (URoW).'

Watch This Space...


Previous article
Lowe Alpine Scoops Polartec Award
Next article
New Stuff!


TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

This is simple selfishness and ignorance. Ignorance because green lanes are ROADS, they always have been. A horse and cart would do more damage than a 4x4 with wide tires and traction to all wheels. (how many ripped up bridleways have you tried walking along) so if anything they should be in better shape now than they ever were.

Selfishness - take out an average 1:25,000 OS map and look at the ratio of green lanes to footpaths, not RUPP's mind you as they are already out of bounds but byways. I would guess it's 1 mile of byways to 100+ miles of footpaths.

I understand that many walkers want to get away from motorised traffic and that's fair enough, i suggest they avoid walking on roads (inc byways). This is plain unjustifiable intolerance of others fair use of public highways.

Neil

Posted: 13/06/2005 at 18:53

I see this is your first post - What the hell are you on about?

I for one have been on many paths/bridleways ripped up by vehicles.

As far as walkers not walking on roads, well unless more paths are made how the hell can a walker get from A to B?



Posted: 13/06/2005 at 18:58

He’s trying to wind us up isn't he? – take a deep breath and count to ten

4x4’s
I’d happily ban the things

Posted: 13/06/2005 at 19:24

See more comments...
Talkback: Anti-Offroading Alliance Emerges

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct:


Latest posts