Gear news
You are looking at: Home : Gear news

It's A Sleeping Bag And A Mat In One

Scoop look at Mountain Equipment's radical new bag and mat combo - yours for 100 quid, but not till next year


Posted: 1 August 2002
by Jon

Okay, here's a bit of a scoop for you from the guys over at Mountain Equipment. It's a new sleeping bag that's due out next Spring and we reckon it could be a winner if you're after a lightweight sleeping solution - ooops, sorry, weird marketing speak.

Like a few other manufacturers before, ME have realised that the base of the sleeping bag doesn't actually do much insulating, seeing as how the filling is crushed flat by your weight, so rather than wasting weight by insulating the base of the bag, they've simply added a pocket for an inflatable sleeping mat.

It's been done before, notably by New Zealanders Macpac, but the neat touch about the ME version is that the mat is sold with the sleeping bag and is cut in a mummy shape so not only do you minimise the weight of the bag, you save on the mat too. The mat's one of the excellent Insulmats sold in the UK by Mountain Equipment. We've been using one of their standard lightweight inflatable mats for the past few months and been impressed, by the way.

Two Integral models are touted for the spring 2003 range, a down-filled Classic Integral O-degrees, rated down to freezing point, which weighs in at a claimed 1300 grammes for the full caboodle of mat and bag, and a synthetic Firewalker I Integral offering a similar 0-25 C comfort range, but weighing a little more at 1750 grammes complete.

Neatly the synthetic version's going to be priced at around £100 all in, which is pretty good for a bag and a quality self-inflating mat and has a pack-size - you can roll the whole thing up in one package - of just 24 x 30cm.

Like we said it's not a completely new concept. Macpac had a similar idea, though it was pricey and the mat wasn't included and RAB's ultralight minimalist Top Bag has a mesh base, but without a mat pocket, whereas the ME bags are fully featured. The Macpac version was effective, but lost marks for comfort, perhaps inevitably when there's no base insulation, whether the same is true of the Integral remains to be seen.

The only other potential drawback that we can see is that the mat being inside the bag means there's a danger the base of the bag could get damp from condensation where it lies directly on the groundsheet making it problematical to pack, but again we'll have to wait and see.

Looks interesting. For more information on Mountain Equipment see their web site.


Previous article
New From The North Face For 2003
Next article
Bush On Hunger Strike Over Nepal


TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Related Content

Related Products


Discuss this story

How many people sleep perfectly still on their back like a dead person, well I know I certainly dont. This idea might work in a rectangular bag where you have the space to move about, but I cant see it working in a mummy bag.

Posted: 04/08/2002 at 19:12

Spent each night this weekend rolling about in my bag. (cue double-entendres)

I'd just end up UNDER the sleeping mat.

Posted: 04/08/2002 at 20:20

The back-sleeping argument was the main criticism of Macpacs similar bags, because of the cooler gaps that form at back and front when lying on your side. However, if the new ME bags have the EXL elasticated seams inside then presumably this won't be as much of a problem, as the inner linner will still be fairly snug. But I can't actually see if they have EXL or not. Any ideas Jon?

Alex - the relative weight of the thermarest would tend to keep it on the bottom surely?

And sleeping on your back makes you more likely to snore and so shouldn't be encouraged - not in my tent anyway!

Posted: 05/08/2002 at 04:10

See more comments...
Talkback: It's A Sleeping Bag And A Mat In One

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: