Mountain Equipment's Revamped Packs
ME has totally overhauled its pack range for 2004 and the result looks neater and sleaker, but the real revelation is that the things feel like they're filled with Helium gas... Barking.
Posted: 28 July 2003
by Jon
We can't give you the full low down quite yet and we'll have full
details and proper pics of the finished things from the Harrogate Go
Outdoors show in a couple of months, but we can reveal that the guys
at Mountain Equipment have completely revamped their pack range for
2004.
ME's sponsored climber, Yorkshire beefcake John Dunne, has spent
the last three months slaving away over the development of the new
packs and putting in the air miles between the UK and factories in
Asia.
The result is a completely new range of packs to replace the
durable but conservative and ME rucksacs introduced a
couple of years ago. Like most of the climbing packs we saw at
Friedrichshafen, the emphasis is on lightness and simplicity.
Shape is streamlined with a cut away base for easier face out
descending, there are laminated straps, removable hip belts, space
mesh backs for improved cooling and some neat touches like Hypalon -
think black inflatable Zodiac fabric - pull tags and axe straps plus
the inevitable water-resistant zips.
The back system is a HDPE sheet with a single alloy stave for
stiffening and coping with hardware loads. The new fabrics used feel
good and tough, but the pre-production models on the ME stand were
incredibly light to the point where we were looking for the hidden
helium balloons...
The climbing packs are going to come in 55, 45 and 35-litre sizes,
cost £60, £80 and £100 respectively and look and feel
like serious light but tough contenders. There are also three new
zip-loading day packs. More details later in the year.
Discuss this story
Is the 35l on really the most expensive? "The climbing packs are going to come in 55, 45 and 35-litre sizes, cost £60, £80 and £100 respectively"
Posted: 28/07/2003 at 15:36
I've just bought a diamond 55+ which weighs 1.5 kilos. That's a good bit lighter than the equivalent Macpac, POD, Osprey, etc. It's lightness was ne of the main reasons I bought it so I'm surprised to hear it described as "slightly heavy".
Posted: 28/07/2003 at 16:06
See more comments...
|
