Richard Gear's Latest Answers

Our man Gear answers questions on lightweight jackets, sleeping bags for bums and rockboots.


Posted: 15 August 2007
by Jon

Our man Gear, Richard Gear, has been hard at work answering your questions and watering his prize raddishes in anticipation of another award-winning performance at the village fete ....

So far Richard has answered over 500 of your questions and you can find all his past answers together with a search mechanism at the Ask Richard Gear section of the site.

Browse through his past answers or ask a question of your own...

This week Richard answers questions on the pros and cons of switching to a lightweight waterproof jacket, suggests a sleeping bag for a dossing, climbing bum and muses on rockboot stretch issues.


 

 

Q: What are the pros and cons of switching to a lightweight waterproof jacket, I like the idea of carrying less weight, but I don't want to throw money away on something that will only last a year or so? ?

A: Gear here, Richard 'Disposable' Gear. It seems a long time since a typical mountain shell jacket weighed in at around a kilo, these days even full-on mountaineering shells are getting close to half that weight and it's possible to find minimalist waterproof tops like the Haglofs Oz Pullover that tip the scales at under 200 grammes.

There's no gain - or loss in this case - without pain though and you need to understand the potential pit-falls of going really lightweight before deciding what to buy...
Full Answer


 

 

 

Q: I am a full-time climbing bum and need a sleeping bag which is warm enough for lowland bivis, bus stations and bedroom floors across Europe throughout most of the year, as lightweight as possible and durable enough to survive constant use. I'd prefer not to spend more than £100 or so. I've been looking at the Alpkit AlpineDream, but am leaning towards the Snugpak Softie or similar for fear of ending up with a sodden, useless down bag that I can't get dry. What would you recommend? ?

 A: The name is Gear, Richard 'Slumbering' Gear, master of the unplanned public-space bivi stop and dedicated bus station crash dummy. Okay, first, the Alpkit bag is excellent value for money, but as you point out, uses down insulation which is less robust than synthetic fills. Also, the Alpine Dream uses an untreated outer shell, so is less resistant to water than some.

If you're prepared to be careful and, particularly, if you team it with a lightweight bivi bag - maybe AlpKits own Hunka bag - and a waterproof stuffsac, then it should do the job and be relatively warm and light too.

The problem is that wet down simply stops working...
Full Answer


  

Q: How much do climbing shoes stretch and are there differences in stretch between the makes? Also does the rubber or shape of the shoe make a difference to climbing?

A: The name is Gear, Richard 'Black Toe Nails' Gear. The good news is that modern rock boots stretch far less than they used to - they will still stretch slightly with climbing use, but generally they won't expand several sizes and embark on a voyage from snugness to bagginess.

There will be some variation between brands and different models and minimalist, slipper-type shoes with little stiffness ... '
Full Answer


Check out the full Ask Richard Gear section of the site for a searchable archive of all Richard's past answers, some of which make sense, or ask a question of your own...


Previous article
Just In - The North Face Anti-Matter Jacket
Next article
Win Inov-8 Trail Shoes, Day Packs And Socks
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

Another thing to be aware of in the longevity of a lightweight shell is how often you actually use it on the hill.  If you're the sort of person that wears a shell more often than not for your walking then it's going to suffer a lot more than if it typically lives in your pack and only comes out in Real Rain (TM).  I use a relatively light Lowe Atom: still looks almost new even though it must be around 5 years old, but it takes quite nasty conditions before I'll actually get it out of my pack.

So if you want to live in it, it may be better getting something chunkier.

Pete.


Posted: 17/08/2007 at 09:21

good point well made

I bought a ludicrously discounted lightweight waterproof from Columbia... used it regularly for travelling (not even mountain abrasion) and watched it steadily disintegrate. If I ever purchase one of the ultra-light moutain shells, it will be for occasional use when Real Rain (TM) is being delivered in quantity. Otherwise a windshell does the job for me.


Posted: 17/08/2007 at 10:02

A bit late on this, but I wonder if it'll go through the same process that mountain biking did a few years back - kit got lighter and lighter, but at the same time became fragile. Eventually people started to produce kit that was more of a compromise, viz, still lighter than before, but more intelligently light, so that it was more durable and functional.
It's already happening with lightweight jackets featuring strategic reinforcement to counter, say, wear from pack straps. And as yet, no-one has had the idea of producing low-abrasion packs with smoother surfaces that are friendlier to lightweight face fabrics. 

Posted: 21/08/2007 at 13:46

See more comments...
Talkback: Richard Gear's Latest Answers



Sign up to our weekly newsletter
Sign up to our twitter feed

Promotions