|
AlpKit PipeDream 400 First
Look
|
 
|
|
Price:
£100
|
|
Weight: 768 grammes (bag only) /
Quantum stuff-sac 9 grammes / Compression bag 86
grammes
|
|
Features
Lightweight sleeping bag with 400 grammes of 90/10 700+
(European scale) full power white goose down, Pertex Quantum
fabric, box-wall construction, hood with elasticated
draw-cord, two-way YKK half-length side-zip, zip and chest
baffles, 400 version comes complete with cotton storage
bag, compression sac and Pertex Quantum Stuff-sac. Comfort
rated down to -3 C. 600 version also available with
full-length zip but without Quantum stuff sac.
|
|
Light, compact, effective and great value.
Hood needs refining, which AlpKit themselves point
out.
|
The Concept AlpKit's original Alpine Dream sleeping bags were
great value, decent spec' all-round bags, the new PipeDream models -
the 400 and 600 -

take
things a stage further by using super-lightweight Pertex Quantum
fabric and a snugger cut to reduce weight.
As with the AD bags, the AlpKit guys have used top grade 700+ fill
power white goose down, but because they sell direct from their own
web site, there's no retail margin, making the new bags great value
for money.
To put that in perspective, the Rab Quantum 400, which weighs in
at 900 grammes, uses the same Quantum fabric and costs around double
the price of the PipeDream 400. The Rab bag uses better spec 96% pure
white goose down with a fill power of 750+EU/850+US. The cut of the
bag is arguably more sophisticated, but it gives you an idea of what
good value the PipeDream is.
Features Super-lightweight, silky Pertex Quantum fabric wrapped
around a soft inner filling of 90 per-cent, 700+ fill power white
goose down. Box-wall construction, a half-zip with a two-way zipper
so you can remain tied in while in the sleeping bag, a hood with an
elasticated zipper, down-filled zipper-baffle, classic mummy shape -
six horizontal box wall baffles, seven vertical hood baffles and
three foot baffles.
There's nothing extraordinary, it's all proven sleeping bag
technology, but without cunning elasticated linings or
differentially-cut foot sections.
In Action Sleeping bags are always hard to test in comparative
terms, but we can already tell you much of what you need to know
about the PipeDream 400.
Based
on a couple of months of use, it's light, packs down really well,
lofts well and is nice and warm for its weight and bulk, which is
basically what it says on the tin. That makes it ideal for
lightpacking, adventure racing - if that's your thing - and
lightweight alpinism, if you like the idea of going light and fast. It's also worth noting that while we haven't felt the need to tie into
our tent, you can use the two-way half-zip to remain tied in to the
rope while on exposed bivvy platforms.
The zip also gives you a handy venting option and makes the bag
useable in milder spring/summer conditions, though you might find
your feet getting a tad toasted in a proper heat-wave, but hey, that's
life.
The fit of the bag is snug without being tight and we didn't get
that nasty, restrictive feeling some lightweight bags major in. The
silky soft Quantum fabric feels nice against the skin too, though
we'd suggest using a lightweight liner to keep things clean and sweet
smelling.
The Pertex Quantum stuff sac at a mere nine grammes is a nice
touch for weight freaks - 400 version only - and saves 77 grammes
over the robust four-way compression sac without any significant bulk
penalty.
Downsides? Like all down bags without a water-proof or seriously
water-resistant fabric, you'll need to keep things dry or lose
performance in a clumping together, wet porridge sort of way. If you
have big feet, you may find the toe box tight, it was fine with our
43s / UK 9s though. And the hood, while it will keep you warm, is a
tad unsophisticated and voluminous, though next year's version will
be updated slightly.
Based on our initial impressions, AlpKit has done it again
with a great value lightweight sleeping bag that does everything
you'd expect it to. By cutting out the retailer, designing their own
products and sourcing direct from the factory, you get a quality
product at a great price.
The materials are all pukka stuff and the design, while it's
hardly revolutionary, is based on proven principles and well
executed. You can pay a lot more and get a more sophisticated bag
using higher spec down, but whether you'd feel the difference in most
situations is questionable.
Know more or want to?
If you'd like to add your own experiences of this
product check out our user review system and post your opinions to
the world. If you have questions you can mail
us direct, ask
Richard Gear or try a posting to our
gear
forum.