Welcome to OUTDOORSmagic
  •  
  • Home
  • Gear
  • Reviews
  • Travel
  • On The Hill
  • Gallery
  • Routes
  • Forum
  • Shop
  • Ask Us
User Reviews | Gear news | Buyer's guides | Gear Forum
Home > News : OTH news
Sunday 21 March 2010 | Personalise | Help  
 OTH NEWS 09 / 12 / 08
 

Gearblog - Insulation Variations...

By Jon

Ever thought UK hills feel colder? There's a good reason and it's all to do with moisture...

Out on the hill the other day with Andy Davidson from FurTech - that's him perched precariously on a gritstone outcrop - and in the middle of the Peak's white crusted snowiness, we got talking about insulation and humidity.

andy davisonInsulation's pretty straightforward really - generally it works like this, your clothing traps air which your body heats up to prevent further heat loss, then, in order to stop wind and air movement from stripping that warm layer of air away from your body, you need some sort of wind-proof or wind-resistant element to hold it in place.

Simple stuff, but in reality what's doing the insulating isn't strictly the clothing. It's the air that it traps. That's all well and good, but guess what, air is variable. In particular, its moisture content varies according to local conditions and that, in turn impacts on how well the air insulates. In simple terms, moist air transmits heat more readily than drier air. And that, in turn, means that the same sleeping bag can feel significantly cooler or warmer depending on the moisture content of the air.

That's why a sleeping bag that kept me toasty warm at -25C in the cold, dry atmosphere of the Andes at 5,000 metres plus, suddenly felt almost marginal in temperatures of -10C in Scottish winter. The bottom line was that the sleeping bag was the same, was trapping roughly the same amount of air, yet that air was a significantly less efficient insulator because its higher moisture content, allowed it to transmit heat away from the body at a faster rate.

How much faster? Well, it turns out that Andy's done some rough calculations which show just how quickly the insulating effectiveness of the airspace in your clothing falls away with the addition of just small amounts of water. According to Andy's table, just adding 10% of water to dry air reduces its insulation value to around 30 per-cent of the dry value.

Water conducts heat some 24 times better than air... which explains a lot. And that's not taking into account the effects of evaporation, it take a lot of heat to evaporate water far more than simply to raise its temperature.

Okay, so it's rough science. But for you, me and other Brits, what really matters is that our moist climate means that clothing simply doesn't keep you as warm. I've climbed waterfall ice in the Alps wearing a softshell jacket and trousers at, say, -10C, and felt fine and comfortable. Try the same clothing in Scotland and I'd be shivering within minutes...

So if you've ever come back from the cold, dry, high mountains of the Alps, Andes or Himalayas and thought, streuth, it feels ridiculously cold at home on British hills, even if it's notionally much warmer, then that'll be why...

Bookmark thisPrinter friendly version
Want to send this article to a friend? Please join here
 

Discuss this article, 1 of 12 messages, read more:
John Burley 
Posted: 09/12/08 17:44:49 49

I have always been glad & impressed to see Andy put so much into researching the science of comfort in the outdoors and applying it to Furtech. And there's a lot that's correct about his assessment; wet clothes do conduct heat much faster than dry ones (even synthetic despite the claims) and the key effect of stuff that keeps you warm when wet is that it lets the water out faster than it accumulates to free up the airspaces.

But Andy's numbers compare proportions of dry air & liquid water... not water vapour. It's well known that liquid water is a much better heat conductor than dry air... but what about water vapour & by inference, "wet" air.

I'm sorry to say that I haven't been able to find any evidence - and believe me I've looked over the years - to justify the claim that "wet air" conducts heat faster than "dry air" (at least when we talk about normal temperatures of human existence and not hundreds of degrees C in chemical engineering plants!).

First, my assumptions - we are talking about trapped air in clothing that is either "wet" (high partial pressure of vapour - and probably high relative humidity also) or "dry" (low partial pressure of vapour and probably low RH). We aren't talking about fog, drizzle or any other kind of 'wet' air... just the maritime weather we get in the UK. The reason I say 'probably' is because warm air holds more moisture and can therefore have more absolute moisture vapour but lower RH. Really we don't care too much about this as we are trying to stay warm when it's cold... The point about being trapped is that I am not going to think about whether wet or dry air behaves differently from a free convection point of view.

OK... so here are some numbers that are readily found online:

Thermal conductivity of dry air is about 0.024 (Andy's site gives 0.025 W/(m.K) which is totally fair as it depends on your definitions)

Thermal conductivity of water vapour at standard temp & pressure (298K, sea level) is about 0.0179 W/(m.K)

Neither vary much with the temperatures we deal with in the UK, though both DECREASE as it gets colder. Moreover, air at 100% relative humidity actually holds a very small mass percentage of water vapour (as can be seen from this chart if you can get your head round it !  ).

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/05/PsychrometricChart-SeaLevel-SI.jpg

In basic terms, there's not much water in the air anyway to mess up the basic dry air conductivity (100%rh at 4C means the air holds approximately 0.5% water by mass).

So, if you interpret that information, the more water vapour there is in your dry air, the BETTER it insulates (as the water vapour conducts less well than the dry air). It's a tiny effect in theory because there's not much water to scew the numbers for dry air, and I can't find any proper data as I've said. I've seen similar 'lore' floating around on the internet about how air with higher RH conducts heat faster but I haven't seen any hard science to support it; certainly not at human-habitable temperatures.

I'd invite Andy or anyone else to demonstrate that I've got it wrong, as it seems to go against my intuition about the feeling of cold in damp weather. It's not an area where I claim any expertise and I'd be glad to acknowledge my error if anyone can show me where it lies.

Read more...
Related articles:
Gearblog - Snowy Winter Kit
A quick run down of the kit and clothing we've been using in the snow and how it's coped.
Gearblog - Premium Pricing?
Top Canadian kit company Arc'Teryx explain just why their gear is so expensive.
Gearblog - Light And Durable?
What happens when you expect modern lightweight kit to have traditional toughness?
Gearblog - Fabric Lab Testing
Ever wondered how big brands test their outdoors clothing? Here's how, plus PU under the microscope.
Rab Microlight Alpine Jacket Tested
We take a look at Rab's acid-hued, ultra-lightweight, micro-baffled down-filled jacket.
FurTech's New Trousers
New winter-friendly trousers from the FurTech stable promise all-day comfort on the hill.
It's A Poncho And A Tarp And A Pack Cover...
>... and a bivvy bag and an emergency shelter - meet the terribly versatile shellTA.
Gearblog - An Obsession With Pants...
How Plas y Brenin instructors work with Gore and ME to make kit better. And what's next?
'Light, Cheap, Durable - Choose Two'
In our latest Gearblog, we ask can you have the ultralightweight cake and eat it too...
Gearblog - Crossover And Proud Of It!
The outdoor industry's dirty cross-dressing secrets revealed...
Gearblog - Much Too Bright Enough?
The latest LED headtorches may have a near 100 metre range, but do you really need all that light?
Gearblog - 17 January, 2008
How Berghaus became coutouriers to Hannibal Lecter and other developments.
Gearblog: Geodesic v Tunnel
Geodesic tents are stronger, right? Well maybe not...
FurTech Talon Jacket - First Look
First impressions of a new jacket using a rather familiar technology :-)
Gearblog - 5 November, 2007
Confused by the new Gore-Tex fabrics, here are a few questions answered.
Gearblog - 20 September, 2007
What happens if you wear a baselayer top with a heavy pack? Now there's an answer...
Hello FurTech Clothing...
A new direction or just a new directional - we meet FurTech's Andy Davison.
Gearblog! 23 January 2007 - New Gore-Tex...
It's goodbye Gore-Tex XCR and hello Gore-Tex Pro Shell later this year. So what's it all about? We're not entirely sure...
Gearblog! 6 November 2006
Is the new über-technical and super specialised Berghaus Big Wall range aimed at so small a niche that no-one will ever buy it and if so, what is it for?
Gearblog! 26 October 2006
Solved in a single day, the two great gear issues that have dogged my existence for years, nay, decades - how a man in a van sorted hoods and pants in one delivery...
Gearblog! 21 September 2006
We promised faithfully not to tell you about two bits of new as in 'not in the shops yet' kit until they're available, but we couldn't resist a sneak peak at the e+LITE in action and a rapid Talon testette.
Gearblog! 1 September 2006
The lighter clothing gets, the more vulnerable it seems to be to abrasion damage from packs, so maybe it's time for a clothing-friendly pack design? The editor muses...
Gearblog! 18 August 2006
The latest in our occasional Gearblog series, what did racing through a quagmire on a mountain bike teach us about kit and what on earth happened to that cat's eyes?
Gearblog! 13 June 2006
I'm forever blowing bubbles, pretty bubbles through breathable waterproof shell fabrics, so what does it all mean and what on earth am I talking about?
Gearblog! 27 April 2006
A tale of two soft shells including the first drizzle-specific, fast-movers' jacket we've come across from The North Face and something rather neat from Swedish brand Haglöfs.
Gearblog! 30 March 2006
Musings on a Gore-Tex launch on the Atlantic island of Tenerife plus Brasher's new Supalite XCR lightweight boot and what it means, or not...

Support our sponsors
 
Join OutdoorsMagic login to OutdoorsMagic
Forgotten your password? | Why should I join OutdoorsMagic?
Support our sponsors
 
Shopping Partners
Ellis Brigham Mountain Sports
Craigdon Mountain Sports
Jackson Sports
Loving Outdoors **SALE**
Springfield Camping
Outdoor Gear
The Complete Outdoors
Fox's Outdoors
Mountain Intelligence
Park Cameras
Ultimate Adventure Hardware
Taunton Leisure
The Outdoor Shop
Go Outdoors
Snow + Rock
Cave and Crag
OS Map Shop
Outdoor Megastore
 
Travel Partners
Explore!
 
Offers, Competitions and Promotions
Win Free Stuff

Win Bridgedale socks
6 pairs of Bridgedale Endurance Trail Ultra Light Socks to be won
Win a £100 gift token
Win £100 to spend at Ultimate Adventure Hardware
Win a pair of TEVA Itunda
Revolutionizing the sports sandal with a brand new product
Win a pair of Steep GT's
Comfort, style, durability & practicality from Zamberlan
Win 1 of 6 Walkabout Satchels
Amazing National Geographic bags worth £145 each

Advertorial: Craigdon Mountain Sports
Celebrating 25 years of Craigdon
Advertorial: Yew Clothing
You love the outdoors. You can show that by choosing Yew Clothing
Advertorial: GTC Satellite Phones
Heading into the unknown? Stay in touch with a satellite phone
Instant Expert Guide To...
Trail Running


GPS Help and User Guide
 
Join Now
Top of Page
About OUTDOORSmagic
- About Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions

Subscribe to OUTDOORSMAGIC RSS news feed.
Contact Us
- Support
- Advertise with us
- FAQ
- Retailers: free site review
Affiliates
- Take our news for free
- RSS Feed
Magicalia Digital Publishing
Active network
- AVReview
- BIKEmagic
- GOLFmagic
- OUTDOORSmagic
- RoadCyclingUK
- Visordown
Parenting network
- Junior
- MadeForMums
- Practical Parenting
- ThinkBaby

- Full Portfolio
Part of the Magicalia Active network
© 1999-2010 Magicalia Ltd.