The Protest That Became A Celebration...

... but don't relax just yet, forests and our National Parks are still under threat.

Posted: 18 February 2011
by Jon
Speakers address the crowd at the recent Grizedale Forest protest rally.

If you've not heard by now, you've most likely been living in a tree house - yesterday the government in the form of Environment Secretary, Caroline  Spelman publically apologised for their ill thought out forestry sell-off plans and, basically, ditched them - for now, at least.

That's great news. For one thing, it shows that no matter how cynical you might be about the givernment's cost cutting measures, there is at least some measure of instant public accountability in the internet age. Around half a million people signed the petition at 38 Degrees, numerous individuals wrote to their MPs, public figures spoke out, protestors rallied and, given that the measures seemed likely to cost the state money as well, finally the government saw sense and backed down.

Which is why, although tomorrow's protest rally at Whinlatter Forest in the northern Lakes is going ahead, it's now a victory celebration with speakers including Sir Chris Bonington and Cumbrian native, Leo Houlding  set to address the gathering.

If you do want to go along, it kicks off at the Visitor Centre at 1pm, with an 11am start for the Mountain bike ride to Save Our Forests - mountain bikers being one of the most active users of forest areas thanks to the Forestry Commission's policy of building trail centres at many of their forests.

Before you get too carried away, bear in mind that the government hasn't undertaken to halt the sale of forest land at the currently legal rate of 15% per annum. In the words of Save lakeland's Forests, 'we are not out of the woods yet'. 

And the government climb down has achieved pretty much what it was intended to. Forests are no longer front page news, instead it's all about AV this morning and in a week or two's time, most people will have forgotten that the forest campaign ever happened.

Don't Forget The National Parks

What you shouldn't forget, and ironically, for a lot of OMers, who are hill and mountain walkers, this is far closer to the door than the forestry sell-off, is that the government has slashed National Park Authority budgets by effectively almost a third over the next four years.

Right now, the Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority has drafted a new budget which is the subject of a public consulation, but will almost certainly see staff redundancies and the end of some services  in the Park and the same process is happening in other National Parks too.

Of course that doesn't mean the sell-off or privatisation of the Parks or even of their administration and right now, the reality is that no-one's really sure what the cuts will mean for users of National Parks, but one thing's for sure, don't be lulled into a false sense of security by the forestry sell-off u-turn, we're still very much in the firing line.


Previous story
Spirit Of Kinder Day Raises Access Fears
Next story
First Winter Summit of Gasherbrum II - Video

Forestry Sell-Off, forests, national parks, government cuts
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

Hopefully it is the end to this forestry sell off plan and not a governement breather before cracking on.

Posted: 18/02/2011 at 15:14

I suspect the government will be happy if it's all just simply forgotten for a while - logically it makes no sense, it doesn't save much, if any, public money, it alienates a huge number of people and it's made them look somewhat stupid. So you'd assume it's just be gone...

...but, the thing about this government is that it's hard to unravel how far they're driven by doctrine - the big society stuff, reducing the size of the state etc - and how much by simply cost cutting for pragmatic reasons. Or whether you even need to separate the two - viz, the need to reduce expenditure becomes a handy justification for implementing Thatcherite-style reductions in public expenditure.

As above, the government can still legally sell off state-owned forests at a rate of 15% p.a even if it's currently all on hold. Whether they do that is another matter, one to watch I reckon.

It dismays me that we're happy to spend billions on defence, but see committed to save a mere fraction of that by cutting back funding for our National Park authorities.

Posted: 19/02/2011 at 08:36

Jon Doran wrote (see)
- viz, the need to reduce expenditure becomes a handy justification for implementing Thatcherite-style reductions in public expenditure.

Were there any?  What?

Posted: 19/02/2011 at 11:38

See more comments...
Talkback: The Protest That Became A Celebration...


Ask Richard Gear
Sign up to our twitter feed

Latest news

GPS help and user guide