Ed Douglas examines the tragic events on K2 last month in the current Observer Sports Monthly.
Following on from last week's
newspaper
features on the recent
tragic events on K2,
that killed eleven climbers, last weekend's
Observer Sports Monthly
magazine carried a typically well-researched and very readable analysis
of the events by specialist mountaineering writer
Ed Douglas.
Drawing on firsthand accounts of the incidents, Douglas deftly
untangles a spider's web of individual happenings and misjudgements and
pulls them together to give a clear idea of what happened on the
world's most dangerous mountain in early August 2008.
Despite early reports which focussed in a serac collapse high on the
mountain, Douglas's article suggests that the problems began far
earlier when a mix-up between different teams on the mountain and
possibly also between Nepalese Sherpas and Pakistani porters, led
either to ropes being fixed at the wrong point in the Bottleneck
section of the climb high on the mountain or simply sub-standard rope
and anchors being employed.
The end result was delay of several hours, which meant that many of the
20 plus climbers heading for the summit were well behind schedule and
descending while tired too late in the day. What prevented them from
descending, says Douglas, wasn't the serac collapse - even though some
ropes had been swept away - but the darkness they found themselves in
thanks to the earlier delays.
It's darkly fascinating reading and interestingly, also makes the point
that while K2 is undoubtedly difficult and dangerous - far more so than
Everest for example - is no longer a venue for cutting edge climbers:
'As it happens, those mountaineers breaking new ground are rarely found
on K2 these days. They do not rely on ropes fixed to the mountain by
someone else. They do not use porters. K2 was first climbed as long ago
as 1954 via the Abruzzi Spur. It's tough, it's dangerous even by
Himalayan standards, and it gets respect from the very best. But
standards have moved on since 1954. A lot.'
The interest in the 8,000ers, he attributes to Messner's feat of
climbing all 14, sparking what he calls 'a freakishly dangerous form of
Munro-bagging' that's lodged in the public imagination.
Well worth a read if you have a spare ten minutes or so -
www.guardian.co.uk