Disease Report Doesn't Go Far Enough
The outdoors industry's trade association says the latest foot and mouth report doesn't adequately address the issue of countryside closures
Posted: 29 July 2002
by Jon
The outdoor industry's trade body has attacked the recent foot and
mouth investigation for failing to address the issue of wholesale
closure of the countryside and called for clear propsals to ensure
that there is no repeat.
According to Go Outdoors. the Outdoors Industry Association, the
Anderson Report 'leaves open the possibility that large parts of the
countryside could again be closed to combat any future outbreak of
the disease in Britain'.
The organisation's chairman, Andy Airey, says that the report
acknowledges that the wholesale closure of rights of way without a
clear mechanism to ensure their re-opening was a mistake, but none of
the 80 recommendations specifically addresses the issue.
This is despite an assurance from minister Margaret Beckett that
the government would not intend to allow the mass closure of
footpaths in any future epidemic.
Airey is now asking the government to 'clarify the circumstances
in which they may permit paths to be closed together with details of
how any closures and subsequent re-openings will be agreed and
communicated.'
According to a Mintel report, sales of outdoor clothing and
footwear fell by £60 million as a result of the combined impacts
of foot and mouth disease and mild weather at the start of the
year.
You can see a summary of the main findings of the first major foot
and mouth report to be published here
on the BBC News site. They include recommendations for mass
vaccination in case of a new outbreak.
The second report is summarised here,
in contrast to the first it suggests vaccination should be available
to be used as an emergency measure, but not as general policy.
Discuss this story
|