Outdoors News
You are looking at: Home : Outdoors News

Last Chance To Object To Peak Road Plan

You have until the end of this week to formally object to a planned bypass that will cut through the Peak Park destroying sensitve moorland habitat and massively increasing traffic in the area.


Posted: 2 May 2006
by Jon

The Peak District Park Authority is officially objecting to a planned bypass which would cut through 1.3km of the National Park threatening areas of sensitive moorland. What's more, if you want to lodge your own objection to the project, you have until this Friday, 5 May pending a public enquiry into the route.

The mooted bypass is a 5.7km route to the west of Glossop which would take traffic round the villages of Mottram, Hollingworth and Tintwistle before feeding it onto the trans-Pennine Woodhead Pass.

At a meeting last month, the Park Authority called for the Highways Agency to look at alternatives to the new road. It fears that the bypass would increase traffic in the area, have an adverse impact on the landscape, both in terms of the road itself and the traffic using it and create air pollution and noise which would impact on access and recreation in the area.

National Park chair Tony Hams said: "We are very concerned about the adverse impact on the National Park of the forecasted increases in traffic, particularly of HGVs, on this heavily-used trans-Pennine route.

"In addition, we are not satisfied that all of the alternatives to the proposed scheme have been fully explored. We would like to see further work undertaken to develop a scheme that has less of an impact upon the National Park.

"We recognise the traffic problems in the villages and we are sympathetic, but the scheme that has been presented is not appropriate for a National Park setting, and would be detrimental to our statutory purposes."

The Alternatives

Campaigners believe that a ban on lorries using the A628 and, possibly, the re-opening of the Woodhead rail route for goods use, would be a more effective means of handling the undoubted traffic problems on the Woodhead road.

They're concerned that the new road will destroy moorland areas and, in particular, Swallows Wood nature reserve, a breeding ground for the rare arctic hare. They also say the new road could lead to traffic increases of up to 124 per-cent, much of which would be funneled across the Peak.

The bottom line is that you have until the end of this week to register an objection to the plan. You can find more details at www.saveswallowswood.org.uk. Objections can be made by e-mail, use the subject line 'OBJECTIONS TO THE A57/A628 MOTTRAM-TINTWISTLE BYPASS' and send your mail to ha_info@highways.gsi.gov.uk. There's an excellent downloadable standard letter on the above site.


Previous article
Hiking In The Dolomites
Next article
Scramble Route - Ledges Route, Ben Nevis


TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Related Content

Related Products


Discuss this story

The Highways Agency is planning a bypass around the villages at the Manchester end of the A628 Woodhead Pass. Unfortunately the planned route cust through some sensitive moorland areas and will also pull more traffic into the Peak Park - the Park Authority is objecting to the scheme.

It's local to me and I have every sympathy for the people who live on the A628 and have huge artics rumbling past their front doors and, until recently, I'd have said I was in favour of the bypass for that reason. The bigger picture though is that road-building solves nothing and just increases traffic and we should be looking at alternatives like removing lorries from this route and using rail for more freight.

Realistically I don't expect that the HA will back down, but if you want to object, you have until the end of this week - Friday 5 May - to do so. There's a draft letter of objection at www.saveswallowswood.org.uk.

And before anyone accuses me of nimbyism, the bypass would make Glossop easier to reach by car from Manchester and potentially increase property values, but there's a bigger picture and bigger precedents.

Posted: 02/05/2006 at 12:38

Something definitely has to be done about the A57 between Tintwhistle and the M67. I counted 18 lorries between Mottram Moor and the M67 roundabout yesterday on one side of the road and its only a small stretch.

However I too believe that the proposed by-pass would not solve anything, it would simply move the bottle neck closer to the actual National Park and during construction and long term would damage the area chosen.

I actually drive to Manchester City Centre from Glossop every day to work so get stuck up in the traffic, but the jams are not half as bad as people make them out to be. The locals I do sympathise with and I know a few around tintwhistle and Mottram, the biggest problem is not the amount of traffic but the amount of heavy goods vehicles. Alternatives must be looked at extensively and the locals must be patient for the right outcome.

The local authorities really do not help the situation either by leaving the current road in the state it is. Less holes and bumps would mean less noise for a start, and the lack of crossings for pedestrians is not fair either.

And I don't want the house prices in Glossop to go up as I'm still renting and waiting for them to go down!!!! :-)

Posted: 02/05/2006 at 14:06

Ta, for the link, I was searching for info on this for a while and not seen this site.

Besides ruining the countryside, I think the increase in traffic volumes that it will lead to will be equally unsustainable, at the other side Langsett/Penistone will become the next Tintwistle's.

Posted: 02/05/2006 at 14:58

Talkback: Last Chance To Object To Peak Road Plan

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: