Outdoors News
You are looking at: Home : Outdoors News

Peak Authority Rejects Wind Turbine Application

Peak District National Park say no to farm's application for 160-foot structure on visual grounds.


Posted: 16 January 2012
by Jon

Beauty in the eye of the beholder - a single turbine at dusk by John Landale from the OM Gallery.

In an interesting counterpoint to the ongoing controversy over the application to erect wind turbines on the fringes of the Cairngorm National Park, the Peak District National Park Authority has just rejected a planning application for a single wind turbine on the basis that the structure was too large.

The situation differs from the Scottish one in that it was for just a single turbine on a farm near Ashbourne and within the National Park itself, but the Park Authority took the view that at 48.4 metres (159 feet) the turbine – incidentally less than half the size of those proposed at Allt Duine – was simply too tall.

'Highly visible...'

It would, they say, 'be highly visible from public rights of way near the site, and also visible from the High Peak and Tissington trails and a wide radius around the area. In addition, the proposed extent, layout and species of trees planted to shield the base would be incongruous in this open, sweeping landscape.

The authority was also, it says, 'conscious that this scheme could set a precedent, not only here but in other national parks, if approved'.

The Park's planning committee did acknowledge its support for renewable energy and concluded that 'there may still be scope perhaps for a combination of technologies that would be less damaging to the national park landscape'.

Meanwhile, objectors to the plans, Friends of the Peak District and National England both, apparently, said they would support a smaller turbine.

Thorny Dilemma...

The whole issue of wind farms and individual turbines is an ongoing dilemma for many outdoors people and organisations. On the one hand, renewable energy sources make undeniable ecological sense, on the other, many find windfarms intrusive and noisy and are vehemently opposed to their presence in National Parks in particular.

Full news release with Nelson's Column reference at www.peakdistrict.gov.uk/news/current-news/wind-turbine-proposal-too-tall-for-national-park.


Previous article
New Review - adidas TERREX GTX Active Shell Jacket
Next article
Monday Tip - Night Safety


wind turbine, wind farm, Peak
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

Hi Jon

The big multinational energy companies would certainly like you to believe that ‘renewable energy makes undeniable sense’, but unfortunately, from an environmental and ecological viewpoint, they are all too ‘deniable’.

Turbines are a classic point. They’re big and in your face - so politicians love them as it seems like they’re doing something about climate change. But start scratching beneath the big business hype and it’s clear they’re just another form of (highly lucrative) industrialisation.

For a start, they’re made out of tonnes of steel and plastic, require vast amounts of concrete to be poured into the earth to anchor them and that’s just the start. Miles of access roads and power line have to constructed to service their intermittent output, and they're usually built across some of the least despoiled parts of Britain.

By the time you take into consideration all the CO2 that’s emitted during construction, it’s reckoned that a lot of these developments will be lucky to be simply carbon neutral by the time their projected 20-25 year lifespan is up.

On top of this, much of the rare earth Neodymium, which used in the dynamos, comes from China where the toxic waste from its quarrying and production is leaving a horrendous legacy of pollution and public health problems.

As one renewables consultant candidly admitted to me recently, from an environmental point of view there’s no point in building all this infrastructure when energy demand continues to go up and up. You can’t reduce CO2 emissions just using the supply side – you have to do something about the demand side – something that is signally not in the energy companies’ interests.

Instead he acceded that the scheme he was planning was being undertaken simply in order to make money for his client – in this particular case absentee American owners of an estate in a well known and very beautiful part of the Highlands.

I’m afraid this is far from an isolated case. You’ll find most of the renewables projects being undertaken are being driven by very cynical financial motives – rather than any actual concern for the environment. RWE, the massive German company behind the Allt Duinne scheme for example, also happens to be one of the world’s largest coal traders – hardly the kind of folk who have the planet’s best interests at heart you might think…

Posted: 20/01/2012 at 20:24

You mean the government should review its position. It's nothing to do with energy companies and why a german coal coal company should be derided for a cheap, and ignorant, point serves only to confuse and demonstrate muddled logic.

Posted: 20/01/2012 at 22:17

Interesting thread and I too have mixed feelings towards this 'new green' industry.

Posted: 21/01/2012 at 10:59

Talkback: Peak Authority Rejects Wind Turbine Application

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct:

Latest posts