Peak Park Welcomes Quarry Court Verdict
The Peak Park Authority has welcomed an appeal court ruling as they attempt to keep a dormant quarry, dormant. Tree-dwelling protestors however have vowed to stay on...
Posted: 21 June 2005
by Jon
The Peak District Park Authority has welcomed a a Court of Appeal
judgement on the legal status of two quarries on Stanton Moor, near
Bakewell, however protestors have vowed to remain at the site.
The Park Authority had classified the long-unused quarries as
'dormant', a designation which makes it much harder to re-open the
workings. The quarry owners Stancliffe Stone appealed against the
decision in the Court of Appeal saying that the works were in fact
'active. The court's decision in favour of the Park Authority means
that the quarries cannot be reactivated until modern environmental
conditions have been imposed.
National Park Authority chair of planning Narendra Bajaria said:
"While we welcome the Court of Appeal's ruling, we now have to
carefully consider the best way forward in the interests of
protecting the National Park."
"The Authority's members will review the options it now has in the
coming months. The original planning permission remains valid, and we
will have to specify working conditions for the quarries unless an
alternative solution can be found."
Meanwhile protestors, who've been living in trees on the site for
the last six years have vowed to fight on, according to the Yorkshire
Post. They quote a spokeswoman for the protestors 'known as
Julie' as saying:
"This is good news, but it is certainly not a victory. We have
been here before. Until we know for certain that this quarrying will
not go ahead then we will not move. The planning permission needs to
be revoked."
The article also says that the quarry company is now in talks with
the Park Authority in an attempt to reach a compromise deal.
The whole situation exists because planning permission for the
quarries was originally granted in 1951 and is technically still
valid though environmental and heritage concerns now make it
massively controversial. Expansion of the quarries is opposed both by
local people, who fear increased disturbance and heavy lorry traffic
and environmental campaigners who fear damage to nearby prehistoric
remains and, generally, to a rural environment.
It does seem vaguely insane that it's technically feasible to
revive disused quarry workings in the middle of a national park on
the basis of a planning application made so long ago.
Discuss this story
|