Outdoors News
You are looking at: Home : Outdoors News

Ramblers Alarmed By Farming Proposals

Walking body adamant that farming reform must not be a threat to countryside access.


Posted: 22 February 2012
by Jon

Farms and the outdoors are inextricably intertwined - The Ramblers are concerned that proposals to reform farming don't also hit access. Image by Glyn from the OM Gallery.

The Ramblers has released a statment expressing its concern that recommendations put to DEFRA by the Macdonald review of farming regulation could 'drastically alter our ability to access the countryside'.

The review is tasked with cutting red tape in the farming world, but some proposals, say the walking charity, could hit acess. In particular, proposals include plans to introduce costs for those who want to claim a footpath on behalf of the public, to make it easier to divert paths and to stop the introduction of new footpaths after 2026.

Here's the full release, which puts The Ramblers' arguments more cogently than we can...

Cutting farming ‘red tape’ must not be a cut to access

Today’s (21 February) Government response to the Farming Regulation Taskforce has created further uncertainty about the future of public access to the countryside - Britain’s Walking Charity warns.

Ministers announced today they were adopting 159 out of more than 200 recommendations put to DEFRA by the Macdonald review of farming regulation. The Ramblers are particularly concerned that they are also considering further proposals; includingrecommendations which could drastically alter our ability to access the countryside.

Proposals which remain on the table include plans to introduce costs to those who wish to claim a footpath on behalf of the public, to make it easier to divert footpaths, and to ensure that no further footpaths could be claimed after 2026.These recommendations, if approved, could completely change the way people interact with the countryside and the natural environment.

The Ramblers is increasingly concerned that the governments push to reduce ‘red tape’ in farming, planning and environmental policy is systematically undermining access rights which have been hard fought for over many years.

Nicky Philpott, Ramblers Director of Campaigns and Policy said:

“With the Government’s Red Tape Challenge already looking to reduce environmental regulation, the proposed changes in planning policy and now today’s farming announcement, it is definitely an uncertain time for walkers.

“There are so many different proposals which could drastically undermine our access rights; potentially closing-off the countryside.

“With the economic, health and well-being benefits of access and walking clearly understood – it is vital that we protect these rights for future generations. Reducing ‘red tape’ must not simply mean reducing access and environmental protection.

“The public outcry over the forests demonstrates the strong public feeling people have towards the countryside and their local green spaces and any moves to unnecessarily chip away at these rights will be bitterly resisted.”

More Ramblers information at www.ramblers.org.uk


Previous article
New Review - Frankly Half-Zip Top
Next article
Just In - Marmot Vapor Trail Hoody


Ramblers, access, farming, DEFRA
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

as someone who likes to roam around counrtyside as well as high places this looks a bit worrying to me,access to rights of way can be hard to distinguish sometimes through low usage so think the ramblers are right to be concerned about this plan. who is this mcdonald person anyway?? please no burger jokes ;-0

Posted: 22/02/2012 at 19:40

Is this only applicable in Englandwales?

Posted: 22/02/2012 at 21:51

The Macdonald Committee was set up by the Government to suggest ways to reduce the amount of red tape and regulation that so irk the farming and landowning community. Its remit covers the whole of the UK but its recommendations for rights of way apply only to England and Wales.

The process for diverting and extinguishing rights of way in England and Wales is complicated, bureaucratic and expensive. Even seemingly sensible alterations that would benefit both farmer and walker, such as diverting a footpath to avoid a farmyard, can be held up because a single objection has been received from a member of the public. There are, or have been in the past, 'professional objectors' who, as a matter of principle, don't want any changes to the path network.

Many years ago, as the Footpath Secretary of my local rambling club, I was involved in a case where, with the agreement of local walkers and amenity societies, a householder applied to divert a footpath that ran through his garden. He wanted to move it a few metres to the other side of his hedge so that it went through the adjacent paddock that he owned. We all expected it to go through on the nod, but a 'professional objector' from hundreds of miles away read about the proposed diversion advertised in the 'London Gazette', and objected. He had no knowledge of the local circumstances but I had great difficulty in persuading him to withdraw his objection.

What seems to have upset the Ramblers is that they had agreed, with the CLA and other farming interests, on a joint approach to the Macdonald Committee, and are upset that the CLA has broken ranks to pursue, what the Ramblers claim, is their own selfish interests. As far as I can make out from the CLA press release, there seems little in it that would materially harm the interests of walkers, but I'm reserving judgement until I've seen the document outlining the CLA's views.

Hugh

Posted: 24/02/2012 at 05:38

See more comments...
Talkback: Ramblers Alarmed By Farming Proposals

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct:

Latest posts