Product Reviews
You are looking at: Home : Product Reviews

Berghaus C7 2 70+10 - Quick Test

Berghaus's airy BioFlex back system gets a makeover for spring. Can we tell the difference?


Posted: 12 April 2007
by Jon

Berghaus C7 2 70+10 - Quick Look

Price: £130

Weight: 2860g

Features Second generation BioFlex 2 back system, EVABREATHE matrix foam technology, dry fusion lid plus rain cover, Gripper breather hip-belt, zipped side entry to main compartment, bottom compartment with zipped divider, two side expansion pockets, wand pockets, lid pocket. 3-litre hydration system compatible, mesh front pocket, side and bottom compression straps, two walking pole holders, attachment points on lid, 40mm Bergbuckle, removable, height adjustable chest harness, grab handle.


What's It For? The c7 2 70+10 - the main body is 70 litres plus 5 litres for each of the side expansion pockets - is a classic all-round backpacking sac with the added bonus of Berghaus's second generation BioFlex system.

BioFlex is intended to allow the pack to move with your body rather than splinting you tightly in position making for better mobility and comfort as well as good load transfer to the hips.


The Techy Bits When we used the first generation of the BioFlex back system, we were blown away with how well it carried with light to medium loads and, in particular, the added mobility that allowed more natural walking, easy high steps and real ease in, say, crossing stiles. However the original back system looked a tad complicated, plasticky and fragile - we never broke ours though - and we know that some potential buyers were put off by the idea that the pack would be hard or impossible to bodge if it broke in the field.

For this year, BioFlex has been substantially reworked. The lower section with the pivoting and elongating hip-belt mount, fingered hip-belt and EVA perforated foam all stays much as before, but there are changes higher up. New shoulder straps lower the profile of the shoulder harness to give a claimed better fit. New aluminium bars are curved to bring the pack closer to your body for added stability and a one-piece shoulder pad replaces the previous adjustable twin-pad arrangement 'for extra stability' it says here.

Other technical highlights include a Dry Fusion taped lid pocket which is nigh on waterproof - the zipper is water-resistant and protected by a flap as well - and a built-in rain cover that sits in a pocket in the lid.


How It Works We liked original BioFlex a lot. It was a little quirky for sure, but the massive mobility made walking feel like a 'Singing In The Rain' style dance along the trail. We had reservations though, with heavier loads, stability seemed to suffer with almost too much movement and the back system looked fragile, though we didn't break it.

To be honest, Bioflex the second coming, actually feels very similar. The changes to the upper back system are claimed to make things feel more stable, but the loose hipped sway of the pack and the ability to bend forwards without restriction were instantly familiar, which we liked.

The changes may make the pack slightly more stable, but as with BioFlex one, we reckon that when loads get really heavy, the movement can feel excessive and the big load luggers from Osprey and Lowe Alpine are better for really big carries.

With light to medium loads, Bioflex is superb giving really impressive mobility. The rest of the pack isn't bad either. We like the use of perforated EVA foam in the lumbar pad - it doesn't absorb water like more traditional foam and mesh combinations, though the upper shoulder pads don't use it. If you want that option, you'll need a C7 Pro instead.

The welded taped lid construction is a nice touch, you can stick electrical items in it and not worry that they'll be soaked if it rains, and a fold-away rain cover looks after the rest of the pack if that worries you.

Traditional side bellows pockets work okay and we liked the option of getting into the main compartment by a zip-entry on the back of the pack as well as the normal top opening. Great for grabbing stuff on the run.

Quick Verdict


We still like Bioflex for its easy mobility though we were hard pushed to detect a massive difference between new and old in use. It does look less space age thanks to the single shoulder pad, which may encourage more buyer confidence.

The free and easy walking motion has to be experienced to be believed, but for really heavy loads we'd look at other options. Still great for light to medium carries though. Otherwise it has all the features you'd expect from a capable backpacking sac and the waterproof lid construction is a neat touch.

Trying is believing. If you're in the market for a medium load carrying pack, then get one loaded up and feel the motion.


Berghaus web site


Know more or want to?

If you'd like to add your own experiences of this product check out our user review system and post your opinions to the world. If you have questions you can mail us direct, ask Richard Gear or try a posting to our gear forum.


Previous article
Alpkit Launches £40 Down Smock
Next article
Easter Holiday Round-Up!


TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Related Content


Discuss this story

Where does medium load end and heavy begin?

Posted: 18/04/2007 at 14:16

Fair question, particularly as there's obviously no definitive dividing line where something goes from being 'medium' to 'heavy' and if you're backpacking, a heavy load can become a medium one as the trip goes on and you consume food and fuel.

Osprey rate their 70-litre Aether pack to carry something between 22 and 28 kilos and their sturdier Crescent to manage up to around 33 kilos and I reckon the transition is somewhere around 25 kilos, maybe less.

In practice I think the C7 is fine up to around 50lb or so, which is a heavyish multi-day pack using non-lightweight stuff, but I wouldn't want to load a lot of expedition climbing kit, heavy tentage and so on into it, if that makes sense.


Posted: 23/04/2007 at 13:30

A handy wee review Jon.

I'm looking for a back packing sac, and I was considering the new C71 series. Am I right to assume it's been tweaked in the same way? (I'm assuming a lesser weight carrying capacity at 65+10l).

I'm hoping that a slightly more involved back system will keep my back in good shape, and keep my sciatica at bay...


Posted: 24/04/2007 at 12:22

See more comments...
Talkback: Berghaus C7 2 70+10 - Quick Test

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: