This is really interesting isn't it...Time for a bit of controversy.
Jon obviously "loves" this jacket, saying
"the Haglöfs 'Less Is More' philosophy has produced an excellent lightweight Paclite jacket"
And indeed the review of the jacket is positive, albeit with some reservations about usage and the price.
Whereas GT in last months Trail puts it away at the back of the reviews amongst the "rest of the test". Although he points out it's good hood and good fit he is more negative empahsising the "drewbacks of the design". It gets a Trail rating of 3/5, and here's a quote:
"Map pocket doesn't take a map, main zip ver stiff (Maybe that's cos it's a waterproof one GT), lacks pockets, high price...."
What's the beef here? Is this an example of the conspiracy theory thing whereby magazines are slaves to the advertisers and concentrate on big names and brush off the rest? (Haglofs being a relatively less well known brand over here, and hasn't advertised in at least the last two months mags...I couldn't believe this to be true EVER, but it does look that way doesn't it.)
OR is it simply an example to us all to read more than one review of a bit of gear AND then still make our own minds up when we go and "have a closer look" at the item.
Funnily enough, the Karrimor jacket got "best in test"...personal reviewers preferences???
Posted: 24/07/2002 at 13:51