Product Reviews
You are looking at: Home : Product Reviews

Haglöfs LIM Ultimate Jacket Tested

Stupidly light and nicely made, the Haglöfs 'Less Is More' philosophy has produced an excellent lightweight Paclite jacket


Posted: 22 July 2002
by Jon

Haglöfs LIM Ultimate Jacket

Price: £210.00

Weight: 316 grammes (men's L)

Features: Gore-Tex Paclite 2 fabric, one chest pocket with drain hole, articulated arms, cuffs with thumb grips, adjustable hood with stiffened peak, shock-corded hem, drop tail, water-resistant main zip with flap

Stupidly light by current standards
Quite short.


If we hadn't had a sneak preview of next year's Haglöfs LIM Ultimate we'd be even more impressed by the current 316 gramme incarnation of their ultralight, Paclite shell jacket., as it is we're just very impressed. This is the sort of application that Paclite was designed for - it's a 'fast mover's' piece of kit with a drop tail for butt protection when running or biking and a minimum of gimmicks. LIM, by the way, stands for 'Less Is More'.

There are some features despite the minimalism including a full main water-resistant zip, backed with a protective flap, a single pocket complete with drain hole and like all Haglöfs hooded jackets, an adjustable hood that's large enough to accommodate a climbing helmet.

The other feature which you'll either love or simply disregard as an irrelevance are thumb holes in the cuffs. They're there to be slipped on under gloves and keep your sleeves from riding up. Of course in the UK that'll mean water running down inside your gloves unless you're prepared to keep them pointing skywards at all times, but it makes more sense in cold, dry, high mountain environments.

Fit is good, albeit cut short to save weight and avoid restricting leg movement, so walkers may prefer a longer style or to team the jacket with a pair of lightweight LIM pants for greater comfort. We also liked the hood and its ability to cover a climbing helmet which makes it an option for clipping to a harness or pack for long mountain routes.

The Paclite 2 fabric used is distinguishable from the original Paclite by dint of its more discreet grey background. It's effectively a highly breathable two-and-a-half layer fabric, with small, polymer dots protecting the membrane from abrasion on the inside.

It's one of the most breathable conventional waterproof fabrics on the market today and despite its lightness, still feels reasonably tough, though we wouldn't recommend extended heavy pack use with the un-reinforced shoulders, though the build quality feels first rate.

The breathability has limits and you'll still get hot and humid when things get really strenuous, but it's appreciably better than other lightweight waterproof fabrics we've tried. One point to bear in mind is that in cooler conditions, the inside of the jacket can feel a little slick and the slight stickiness of the polymer dots mean that Paclite doesn't slide over some underlayers as easily as some shells and feels a little odd if you wear it directly against the skin.

Verdict: Very, very light, quite minimal and acceptably breathable - if you want a fast-moving Paclite jacket and you want it today then the LIM Ultimate is somewhere near the top of the list. The helmet-sized hood is a bonus, but it still works okay snugged down to normal head dimensions using the one-pull adjuster. Limitations are that it has only one pocket, there's no venting and we've seen next year's version and it's even better. The fabric's good by any standards, but again, we know that the 2003 version is even more breathable. If you want a jacket today though, this is the lightest of its type we've found, it's beautifully made and while we wouldn't want to use it for extended pack hauling or rub it against abrasive rock, it doesn't feel flimsy either.

Performance

Value


Haglöfs web site

Pushed for time: Very light, quite short, market-leading fabric for this year and the hood fits over a helmet. The only thing that would put us off this jacket for speedy bombing around is knowing that next year's version - out early 2003 - is even better. But if you need it now, this is quality.

Know more or want to?

If you'd like to add your own experiences of this product check out our user review system and post your opinions to the world. If you have questions you can mail us direct, ask Richard Gear or try a posting to our gear forum.


Previous article
Rambler Baiter Goes Down For Manslaughter
Next article
Ramblers Restraint At Hoogstraten Verdict


TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Related Content

Related Products


Discuss this story

This is really interesting isn't it...Time for a bit of controversy.

Jon obviously "loves" this jacket, saying

"the Haglöfs 'Less Is More' philosophy has produced an excellent lightweight Paclite jacket"

And indeed the review of the jacket is positive, albeit with some reservations about usage and the price.

Whereas GT in last months Trail puts it away at the back of the reviews amongst the "rest of the test". Although he points out it's good hood and good fit he is more negative empahsising the "drewbacks of the design". It gets a Trail rating of 3/5, and here's a quote:

"Map pocket doesn't take a map, main zip ver stiff (Maybe that's cos it's a waterproof one GT), lacks pockets, high price...."


What's the beef here? Is this an example of the conspiracy theory thing whereby magazines are slaves to the advertisers and concentrate on big names and brush off the rest? (Haglofs being a relatively less well known brand over here, and hasn't advertised in at least the last two months mags...I couldn't believe this to be true EVER, but it does look that way doesn't it.)

OR is it simply an example to us all to read more than one review of a bit of gear AND then still make our own minds up when we go and "have a closer look" at the item.

Funnily enough, the Karrimor jacket got "best in test"...personal reviewers preferences???

Posted: 24/07/2002 at 13:51

I think you've hit the nail on the head there Alex, when you suggest we read a couple of reviews and then go and make our own minds up.

I now use reviews mainly to get a feel for what features a jacket has. I still take note of any critisisms made by the reviewers, but always check these for myself when I take a look at the item in question.

I'm sure that GT praised the Karrimor jacket on its benefits alone and not for any other reason. I'm a great fan of GT. Just ask Jon!

Si(C)

Posted: 24/07/2002 at 14:14

I suspect - haven't seen the test - that the LIM jacket has been reviewd in the wrong class of product. Like putting an GTi in a supermini group test, and then wondering why the fuel economy is crap. The LIM is an all-out AR jacket and is very, very good. So what of the pocket doesn't take an OS map? How many Ar'ers carry whole OS maps with them?

GT and the rest of Trail can't review for toffee. They're all crap! How can they apparently slate a product, put in rest of test, and then give it 3/5? Surely 1/5 is the logical score?

And they're bloody obsessed with Karrimor. I haven't picked up a Trail for 18 months (Karrimor one everything back then, that's one of the reason I stopped bothering with it) but I assume Karrimor advertises a lot in it? Karrimor are good, and their clothes deserve to be distributed more, but GT's obsession is daft - and extremely obvious.

Posted: 24/07/2002 at 14:23

See more comments...
Talkback: Haglöfs LIM Ultimate Jacket Tested

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: