Product Reviews
You are looking at: Home : Product Reviews

Osprey Atmos 25 Tested

Possibly the best lightweight day pack we've ever used from the nice people at Osprey on the other side of the big pond. Just don't wear it for mountain biking ;-)


Posted: 21 July 2005
by Jon

Osprey Atmos 25 Tested

Price: £70.00

Weight: 880 grammes (medium)

Features: Lightweight pack available in small, medium and large back sizes, capacities 23, 25 and 27 litres respectively. AirSpeed suspension system, contoured mesh back panel with flexible alloy frame, thermo-formed and perforated waffle pattern shoulder pads and hip-belt, hip fin pockets, full panel loading main compartment with zip opening, welded front stretch woven pocket, stretch woven side pockets, hydration pocket, additional hydration cavity behind mesh, ergo pull hip straps, side compression straps.

Lightweight, comfortable, cool, stable.
Nothing really.


The Concept The Atmos series is Osprey's take on the lightweight day sac with the 25 being the smallest of the three - there are also 35 and 50-litre versions available. The pack's aimed at pretty much anyone looking to minimise weight but without sacrificing comfort and stability. There's also more than a nod to hot condition comfort with a suspended mesh panel back system and perforated foam hip and shoulder straps maximising ventilation.
Features The Atmos is swimming with cleverly thought-out detail, but the heart of the sac is the clever AirSpeed back system. It uses a flexible top-spec aluminium frame with a tensioned mesh back panel stretched over it. The frame bends with the torso, the panel holds the pack away from the back for ventilation and comfort. You can also pop an additional hydrationbladder inside it.

That's just the start though, the hip-belt and shoulder straps use neat perforated foam, there are handy hip-fin pockets for quick access to frequently used items like cameras and food, stretch side and back poclets allow easy stuffing and a big zip gives rapid access to the main body.

All the detailing is neat and carefully claculated too, so the big zip-pulls are easy to grab hold of and the hydration tube guides on the shoulder straps actually guide to pipe into just the right position, angled inwards, instead of straight down. Nice.


In Action We've been using the Atmos for a few months now and it's become our first choice day sac for everything bar climbing and biking. It's a fantastic carry. Load it up, weigh the Atmos in your hand then put it on. As soon as it's on your back with its close, easy fit, it's as if the weight has been halved. It's uncanny, but true. This really is a very effective lightweight back system.

It's also pretty damn cool in hot conditions. Perhaps not quite as cool as a pack with open sides to the back cavity, but not far off and, more to the point, it doesn't feel like it's trying to pull away from the back the way some of those packs do. The perforated harness and belt are comfortable too and the perforation certainly doesn't hurt cooling while cutting grammes at the same time.

We also love the detailing that adds up to mostly hassle-free use. Those mesh hip pockets are spot on for quick access on the move and the stretch exterior pockets are just right for stuffing away spare clothing and other wet things. Twin side compression straps let you cinch things down when the sac is part loaded and you can rig the hydration tube to route to either side.

It also seems to be larger than its nominal capacity of 25 litres, more like a conventional 30-litre pack with the easy to access main compartment swallowing a surprising amount. If things get too much, you can even re-locate your hydration bladder in the cavity between mesh and sac and free up some more internal space. A zipped back pocket with water-resistant zip makes up for the lack of a lid pocket.

Downsides? You need to unclip the top compression strap for easy access to the main zipper plus if you use it for mountain biking, on steep descents, the top bar can foul the bottom of your helmet and restrict your vision, and yes, we did crash as a result... We'd also be wary of using it in 'rough' climbing situations where rock abrasion might be an issue.


Verdict


We don't say this sort of thing often, but the Atmos 25 is a damn near perfect lightweight day pack. It carries beauitifully, is well suited to hot conditions and can be cinched down to be super stable as well. One of the best day sacs we've ever used, period.

Performance

Value


Osprey web site


Pushed for time: Damn near perfect lightweight day sac with a fantastic ventilated back system, a great carry and fantastic detailing. Lovely :-) Not cheap though.


Know more or want to?

If you'd like to add your own experiences of this product check out our user review system and post your opinions to the world. If you have questions you can mail us direct, ask Richard Gear or try a posting to our gear forum.


Previous article
Haglofs New Stuff Scoop
Next article
Weekend Weather Outlook


TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Related Content


Discuss this story

Ok, so its a really good sack. But surely £70 for a 25ltr daysack is a bit pricey. Please don't start going blase about the price of kit like they do in the mountain bike world! £70 quid is a lot of money!

Posted: 29/07/2005 at 11:30

Hi Adam,

I fully agree that £70 isn't cheap for a 25 litre daypack, but it doesn't mean it represents poor value.

If any product (outdoor or any other) is well thought out, offers unique features and innovation and will fit & perform better, and last longer then I think for some users the extra cost is worth it.

Naturally, if you are paying £20-£30 extra for a logo then that isn't good value, as a logo won't do any of the above. The Atmos packs do cost more to make than other daypacks of a comparible size, thus they are more expensive as a result.

I have read with interest some OM user reviews of a 35+8 daypack which retails at £60 and it scores quite low on the value front. I don't think there is a direct relationship to litre size, price and value.

As to Mountain Bike gear I also agree with you, the money you can spend on a bike (or even on small bits of a bike) is pretty crazy. Which makes our Atmos 25 look cheap. I guess that everything is relative?

Cheers

Rob
Osprey

Posted: 29/07/2005 at 12:21

Hi Adam, fair comment. I tend to assume that people make their own decisions on what's an acceptable price though which is why I didn't mention it specifically, though I have added a brief note now.

If you look at the Atmos test it scores four for value despite being relatively expensive and that's because it does what it does very well indeed. I realise it's a murky area, but it's a very good pack, so my take on it is that you get what you pay for. If it was 20 quid cheaper, it would have scored five for value.

Obviously it's a subjective judgement and a balance between the price and performance. The Alpkit sleeping bag we tested recently got a five for value even though it doesn't perform quite as well as the top brands out there because it gives an outstanding compromise between price and quality.

We're not about to become blase about price, but equally it's relative to performance, which is what the value rating is all about.

Hope that makes some sense and thanks for the feedback :-)

Posted: 29/07/2005 at 12:41

See more comments...
Talkback: Osprey Atmos 25 Tested

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: