Product Reviews
You are looking at: Home : Product Reviews

Sealskinz New Waterproof Gloves Tested

It's waterproof, it's sticky, it's close fitting with no internal seams and a claimed 300 per-cent more breathable than its predecessor, but ...


Posted: 23 December 2002
by Jon

Sealskinz New Waterproof Glove

Price: £22.50

Weight: 78 grammes (medium)

Features: waterproof PorelleP5 40 hydrophylic membrane, nylon/lycra outer layer with ergonomic sticky grip dots, 97% Thermolite, 3% Lycra inner glove, seamless construction.

Waterproof
But not very warm


We weren't particularly impressed with the original Sealskinz waterproof glove - it had limited breathability and while it was waterproof, it had all the thermal properties of a layer of clingfilm. Well, the good news is, oh sod it, there is no good news, the latest incarnation of the glove, while improved, is still a solution looking for a problem that doesn't do it for us.

Top for washing up?

First, it is waterproof, but despite being a claimed 300 per-cent more breathable than its predecessor, it still felt clammy in use. Next, although the lining is marginally more fleecy than before. it's still not a warm glove - we'd guess that it would have the same level of effectiveness as a standard liner glove - the Sealskinz one is good by the way - but the thin fingers use lycra for a close fit, which in turn compresses your fingers and seems to restrict blood flow. The result is that the glove feels cold and adding liner gloves as Sealskinz suggest just increases the restriction slightly.

Realistically you want waterproof gloves when things get cold, which is when you want warmth as well. In more pleasant conditions, no-one really gives a stuff about wet hands, so what are they for?

Positive points? Well, the sticky dots work well and the seamless construction means a lack of fit-spoiling internal seams common to fleece gloves - an alternative solution is to site the seams on the outside as Berghaus do with some of their gloves.

For UK winter use, you'd be better off with a fleece glove and a waterproof over-glove or a windproof microfleece glove for cold, dry, windy conditions. It's hard to know what you'd use the Sealskinz for. Possibly desperate moves on ultra-difficult mixed ice routes would fit the bill, but for everything else, bar the washing up, there are better solutions.

Verdict: Yes they're waterproof, but they're not breathable enough or warm enough and the close fit of the fingers seems to restrict circulation making things worse. Unless you have a specific use for tight, cold, waterproof, but sticky gloves in mind, we'd leave well alone.

Performance

Value

Sealskinz web site

Pushed for time: Updated waterproof gloves with sticky palm and fingers, close fit, no seams, but not breathable enough and with the thermal efficiency of soemthign not very warm not helped by the finger constricting elasticated fit. Leave well alone.

Know more or want to?

If you'd like to add your own experiences of this product check out our user review system and post your opinions to the world. If you have questions you can mail us direct, ask Richard Gear or try a posting to our gear forum.


Previous article
Vango Storm Shelter - First Look
Next article
Last Minute Christmas Presents!


TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

As a kayaker, mountaineer, mountain biker and climber, I have found many the requirement for a windproof, waterproof and warm breathable glove.

 *THESE GLOVES SATISFY NONE OF THE ABOVE CRITERIA*

They soak through, leaving your hands cold; they blow through, freezing the already-penetrated water within; they are not warm even when dry and not windy.

 The Sealskinz socks are a phenomenal product - the gloves are not.


Posted: 07/10/2008 at 13:42

I wonder if these have 'earned' the lowest average score of anything that's been frequently user reviewed here? 37% over 25 tests must make them a contender, especially as the total average score across all products must be around 80!

(I agree that the score is well deserved. Ugh.).

Or has anything else reviewed worse than this in quantites?

And yet they still make them and they still get stocked in high street shops. Crazy world. I guess the problem is that they look potentially good in the shop.....


Posted: 07/10/2008 at 14:11


ss

What does work?!


Posted: 07/10/2008 at 16:48

See more comments...
Talkback: Sealskinz New Waterproof Gloves Tested

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct:


Latest posts