Sealskinz New Waterproof Gloves Tested
It's waterproof, it's sticky, it's close fitting with no internal seams and a claimed 300 per-cent more breathable than its predecessor, but ...
Posted: 23 December 2002
by Jon
|
Sealskinz New Waterproof
Glove
|
 
|
|
Price:
£22.50
|
|
Weight: 78 grammes
(medium)
|
|
Features:
waterproof PorelleP5 40 hydrophylic membrane, nylon/lycra
outer layer with ergonomic sticky grip dots, 97% Thermolite,
3% Lycra inner glove, seamless construction.
|
|
Waterproof
But not very warm
|
We weren't particularly impressed with the original Sealskinz
waterproof glove - it had limited breathability and while it was
waterproof, it had all the thermal properties of a layer of
clingfilm. Well, the good news is, oh sod it, there is no good news,
the latest incarnation of the glove, while improved, is still a
solution looking for a problem that doesn't do it for
us.
|

|
|
Top for washing
up?
|
First, it is waterproof, but despite being a claimed 300 per-cent
more breathable than its predecessor, it still felt clammy in use.
Next, although the lining is marginally more fleecy than before. it's
still not a warm glove - we'd guess that it would have the same level
of effectiveness as a standard liner glove - the Sealskinz one is
good by the way - but the thin fingers use lycra for a close fit,
which in turn compresses your fingers and seems to restrict blood
flow. The result is that the glove feels cold and adding liner gloves
as Sealskinz suggest just increases the restriction slightly.
Realistically you want waterproof gloves when things get cold,
which is when you want warmth as well. In more pleasant conditions,
no-one really gives a stuff about wet hands, so what are they for?
Positive points? Well, the sticky dots work well and the seamless
construction means a lack of fit-spoiling internal seams common to
fleece gloves - an alternative solution is to site the seams on the
outside as Berghaus do with some of their gloves.
For UK winter use, you'd be better off with a fleece glove and a
waterproof over-glove or a windproof microfleece glove for cold, dry,
windy conditions. It's hard to know what you'd use the Sealskinz for.
Possibly desperate moves on ultra-difficult mixed ice routes would
fit the bill, but for everything else, bar the washing up, there are
better solutions.
|
Verdict: Yes they're waterproof,
but they're not breathable enough or warm enough and the
close fit of the fingers seems to restrict circulation
making things worse. Unless you have a specific use for
tight, cold, waterproof, but sticky gloves in mind, we'd
leave well alone.
|
|
Performance
|

|
|
Value
|

|
|
Pushed for time:
Updated waterproof gloves with sticky palm and fingers,
close fit, no seams, but not breathable enough and with the
thermal efficiency of soemthign not very warm not helped by
the finger constricting elasticated fit. Leave well
alone.
|
Know more or want to?
If you'd like to add your own experiences of this product check
out our user review system and post your opinions to the world. If
you have questions you can mail
us direct, ask
Richard Gear or try a posting to our gear
forum.
Discuss this story
As a kayaker, mountaineer, mountain biker and climber, I have found many the requirement for a windproof, waterproof and warm breathable glove. *THESE GLOVES SATISFY NONE OF THE ABOVE CRITERIA* They soak through, leaving your hands cold; they blow through, freezing the already-penetrated water within; they are not warm even when dry and not windy. The Sealskinz socks are a phenomenal product - the gloves are not.
Posted: 07/10/2008 at 13:42
I wonder if these have 'earned' the lowest average score of anything that's been frequently user reviewed here? 37% over 25 tests must make them a contender, especially as the total average score across all products must be around 80! (I agree that the score is well deserved. Ugh.). Or has anything else reviewed worse than this in quantites? And yet they still make them and they still get stocked in high street shops. Crazy world. I guess the problem is that they look potentially good in the shop.....
Posted: 07/10/2008 at 14:11
See more comments...
|