OUTDOORSmagic
 Home » Product Reviews > Rucksacks > GoLite Gust ReviewsTuesday 14 October 2008 | Help  
Free weekly newsletter!
Join OUTDOORSmagic now
Members can use the forum and gallery, receive a weekly newsletter and are eligible to win great prizes!
why join?  
Latest Reviews
6966 Total Reviews
VauDe Triset 35 + 8
by Jethro
Meindl Burma GTX
by Jethro
Exped Fold Top Dry Bag
by Jake
Raichle Mt Trail GTX
by stomper73
Exped Fold Top Dry Bag
by david culshaw
» Loads More Reviews
Sell your stuff!
Got gear to BUY or SELL?

Check out the OM classifieds and post an ad or see what's on offer.

Can't find what you want? There's always the wanteds section.

Travel Partners
Travel Partners
Exodus
Explore!
Inghams
 GoLite Gust
Sponsored by
Karrimor
Bookmark this
Average Rating: 4 out of 5
No. of Reviews: 8
RRP: £79
Year: 2001

Description: Lightweight Rucsack

 REVIEWS
 
1 to 8 of 8 reviews, to post a review you need to be a member - Join now. 
Jake Lunniss 
Posted: 14/09/06
'SWALLOWS (AHEM...) KIT LIKE NO OTHER'
Strengths:
It has a seemingly endless ability to take on kit (which is rather perverse for an ultra-light 'sack). It easily carried kit for 5days in Galloway, including food, and at a weight of around 40lb, was comfortable. The hipbelt design is genius. The material is hard-wearing (I've been using it for 6 months, and I don't understand people who say it isn't), and the build quality is typical of golite - flawless. And the price is pretty nice, too.
Weaknesses:
The stability is genuinely apalling. Adding some compression straps and stabiliser straps would make an enormous difference, as would mesh side pockets.
Overall:
Not perfect, but with some minor tweaking (simple enough to easily do yourself) it'll be close enough.
 
Performance
 
80%
Reliability
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Overall Rating
 
93%
 
George Griffin 
Posted: 25/02/02
'A Rucsack that 20ozs and can carry loads of up to 30 pounds'
Strengths:
20ozs, 65 to 88 litres
Weaknesses:
not waterproof, maybe unstable with heavy loads
Overall:
The way all rucsacks should be.
 
Performance
 
60%
Reliability
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Overall Rating
 
67%
 
Bennie macdonald 
Posted: 20/10/02
'NEW CONCEPT WORKS GREAT TOUGHER THAN YOU THINK'
Overall:
good kit sure it could handel a little over loading now and then , tougher then it looks very comfortable all down to packing correct.
 
Performance
 
100%
Reliability
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Overall Rating
 
80%
 
Russ Manion 
Posted: 30/11/02
'VERY LIGHT, STRONG, GOOD CARRY'
Strengths:
light weight,natural carry, spacious,well made.
Weaknesses:
Water resistance seems a bit low,could do with extra external pocket (only has one )
Overall:
I like this bag. Needs some discipline when packing. The weight carrying capacity when considering its own lightweight is excellent. Above 30lbs is too much for stability and comfort.
 
Performance
 
80%
Reliability
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Overall Rating
 
87%
 
Ratatosk  
Posted: 13/05/04
'GREAT UL PACK FOR LONGER OUTINGS'
Strengths:
Light, comfortable.
Weaknesses:
No side mesh pockets.
Overall:
Great value. If you want the back a bit stiffer, remove the foam pad from the back pocket and make a "copy" from a thicker foam sleeping mat.
 
Performance
 
80%
Reliability
 
60%
Value
 
100%
Overall Rating
 
80%
 
Owen Bennett 
Posted: 27/06/04
'GREAT LIGHTWEIGHT SACK'
Strengths:
So light,strong ,good carry.
Weaknesses:
Must use a rain cover.No mesh pockets.
Overall:
Roll a foam mat inside it and put gear in that.Sew two mesh pockets on and you have a great lightweight backpacking sack at a good price
 
Performance
 
80%
Reliability
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Overall Rating
 
73%
 
Matthew Pullan 
Posted: 09/08/04
'PERFECT ULTRALIGHT PACK FOR LONG OUTINGS'
Strengths:
Very strong, great carry, very light. I used one on the Pyrenees HLR and it was deffinately the right sack!
Weaknesses:
No hole for hydration tube, tool loops are low on the pack so get worn when putting the sack down
Overall:
The best pack I've ever used. Why did we ever put frames in?
 
Performance
 
100%
Reliability
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Overall Rating
 
100%
 
Eurus  
Posted: 14/09/04
'ULTRALIGHT NEEDN'T MEAN UNCOMFORTABLE'
Strengths:
Very comfortable considering the frameless construction, ultralight, I love the simplicity.
Weaknesses:
Poor water resistance, annoying top closure to bag, unstable when overloaded, no mesh pockets.
Overall:
I never thought that 'ultralight' could be synonymous with 'comfort' – until now. As long as I keep the weight down I find it carries far better than my high-spec bag that weighs 4x as much. Mesh pockets on outside would be great. Not waterproof, but I use a waterproof liner, so this is not a big issue for me.
 
Performance
 
80%
Reliability
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Overall Rating
 
80%
 
 MY REVIEW
 
You need to be a member to post a review. You can join here free.
Members Logon
Email:
Password:
forgot your
password?
Support our partners

 Send to friend | Join Now ^ Top of Page
About OUTDOORSmagic
- About Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions

Subscribe to OUTDOORSMAGIC RSS news feed.
Contact Us
- Support
- Advertise with us
- FAQ
- Retailers: free site review
Affiliates
- Take our news for free
- RSS Feed
Magicalia Digital Publishing
Cycling
- BIKEmagic
- RoadCyclingUK
- SheCycles
- LondonCycleSport
- Visordown
- ProTourNews
Outdoors
- OUTDOORSmagic
- FISHINGmagic
- GOLFmagic
- TheMainSail
Lifestyle
- ThinkBaby
- Gardening.co.uk
- AVReview
- ThinkCamera
Hobbies
- ModelFlying
- MilitaryModelling
- ModelBoats
- GetWoodWorking

- Full Portfolio
© 1999-2008 Magicalia Ltd.