Thoughts from the outdoors

Clearing Up Their Own Mess

Time for the National Parks to ban recreational motorised off-roading

Posted: 1 August 2011
by Nikalas Cook

The National Parks need to do more to remove motorcyclists

The countryside is protected but not it's not being enforced

I like to think I’m a pretty tolerant guy and, with political leanings that some would class as bleeding heart liberal, the notion of banning things never sits well with me. Despite being a non-smoker, loving the fact you can spend an evening in a pub now without coming home stinking like an ashtray and well aware that not being forced to breathe other peoples’ smoke is a definite plus for my health, my wishy-washy liberal side still struggled with the ban. Despite this, I’m now adamant that it’s time for the National Parks to man up and ban recreational motorised off-roading outright.

The 4x4’s are bad enough and have ruined several By-Ways for other users in my home patch of the Dark Peak and my original home of the chalk downs of Wiltshire. Spewing out diesel fumes, getting stuck behind a line of these crawling monsters can make a pleasant run or ride a frustrating, noisy and noxious experience. 4x4’s at least are slow moving and limited as to where they can go, my real beef is with trail motorcycles.

The fact that they’re lighter and faster than a 4x4 means that the temptation to wander off legal By-Ways, and be able to make a speedy getaway if caught, seems irresistible to bikers in my part of the world. I regularly see motorcycles popping 100% illegally up to the top of South Head, a local hill that overlooks Kinder with fragile grass flanks, and gouging out scars of turf with their high revving engines. Even when they do stick to legal routes, the angry swarm of bees two-stroke whine is totally incongruous with almost every other activity that goes on in the Peak Park, you can see significant erosion in action as they pass and watch out for the barrage of stones and debris kicked up by their back wheels.

There are plenty of disused quarries and purpose built off-roading centres, so it’s not as if a ban in the National Parks would be the death of their pastime. I’ve taken part in 4x4 skills days at one of these centres, really enjoyed them, am sure that the driving and obstacles were far more exciting and challenging than By-Way bashing and I wasn’t making a right of way impassable for horse riders, mountain bikers or walkers.

I found the following definition of a National Park:

“A scenic or historically important area of countryside protected by the government for the enjoyment of the general public and the preservation of wildlife.”

I can’t see how allowing access for recreation motorised vehicles can ever fall within the remits of this definition.

What provoked this rant was the press release below. Personally, I found it laughable and couldn’t quite believe that Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority couldn’t see the irony in releasing it. A good analogy would be congratulating an arsonist for re-building a house they’d burned down. “Well done, but you really shouldn’t have done it in the first place and you’re going to get those matches out again aren’t you?”

Maybe I’m being overly harsh and cynical, what do you think?

Motorcyclists make tracks in the National Park 

Grassington, 26 July, 2011.

Trail motorcyclists have been helping repair a section of Roman road in the Yorkshire Dales National Park.

Members of the Teesside & North Yorkshire Trail Riders Fellowship helped National Park Authority Rangers repair the surface of the byway near Hawes after it suffered frost damage during the prolonged freeze and snowfall last winter.

As a result, the road, which linked Ingleton to the Roman fort at Bainbridge, had become rutted and difficult to use. 

The trail riders helped the Rangers lay 120 tons of aggregate and then compact it to consolidate the surface.

National Park Authority Area Ranger Matt Neale said: “The help from the Trail Riders Fellowship has been invaluable as we had a lot of stone to shift. 

“More than 20 volunteers helped resurface the most damaged sections of this route – it’s been a successful couple of days work. Trail motorcyclists have received a lot of negative press over the last few years, but now some responsible riders have stepped forward to help us repair routes that they regularly ride ''

Teesside & North Yorkshire TRF spokesman Leo Crone said: “The TRF welcomes the opportunity to assist in the maintenance of the vehicular network of green lanes in the National Park’s area – we have always tried to be part of the solution rather than the problem of recreational vehicles in the countryside.

“There are plans to hold another working weekend for TRF members later this year, where other routes in the National Park that get legally used by vehicles will be repaired. Members should keep an eye on the National Forum for details.”

Andrew Colley, the YDNPA’s Member Champion for the Natural Environment. said:

“This just shows the good work that can be achieved by working together with all users of the public rights of way for the benefit of everyone and the National Park.”

Previous story
More Pics Of Those 2012 Montane Packs...
Next story
Irvine Body Search Creates Storm


national, park, off, road, motor, ban, environment, health
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

Hard not to agree with Nik on this one. There are enough purpose built facilities for motorcyclists and 4x4 enthusiasts these days. For every considerate off-roader who is willing to give something back like those in the article above there are dozens who don't care for the environment or other members of the public.

Posted: 01/08/2011 at 09:57

One might say then, that there are enough purpose built paths in our urban environments for us walkers too - without wearing out the countryside terrain.

Whilst I am not a fan of the 4 x 4 vehicles, whilst ever they are on legal byways - then they have as much right to travel on them as any other form of transport - feet included. However I'm all for downgrading the status of these lanes where it is felt appropriate in terms of cost of repair.

As for bikes - I can't say I see that many on my travels... its not too hard for me to find areas that don't have public bridleways and bike friendly green lanes. The damage created by the small minority that do 'off road' could easily be compared to the amount of erosion done to tracks in popular areas due to footfall ie small paths turned into wide (and widening) tracks. The bikers I have seen have always been friendly and considerate to me as a walker.

Good on those bikers who have helped with the track repair I say. I have to hold my hand up and say that for all the walking I do each year, I have yet to help with footpath renewal organised by the various countryside access groups.

Posted: 01/08/2011 at 12:06


TP
Devil's advocate - "There are plenty of disused quarries and purpose built off-roading centres, so it’s not as if a ban in the National Parks would be the death of their pastime."

There are plenty of parks where you can go for a walk so if you banned walking in the hills its not like it would be the death of that activity.

I just wanted to say that just because there are riding parks (not sure where my nearest one is) or walking parks (like Roundhay Park in Leeds and many others) doesn't mean that people would enjoy being confined there. It's like stopping one group going somewhere because you like that area for yourself or your activity.

As far as riders repairing trails is like the arsonist re-building the house he has burnt down. Well correct me if I'm wrong but there are many areas with major erosion issues from walkers and there are walking groups who join working parties to repair paths. Isn't that also similar to the riders situation?

The only thing is the engine. Noisy it is but it passes. The tyres can churn up trails more than individual feet (just like MTBs do but more so because of a more powerful engine), however it is a minority activity. Which causes more damage, a small number of riders or a huge number of walkers?

Personally I am less worried about riding on legal routes (totally agree that illegal route riding should be stopped somehow). My only concern is if the rider injures anyone. I have turned a corner on a legal route between stone walls and gone straight into the first of a group of riders. They were going downhill so the engines were idling more and this rider was a little ahead of the others so whilst I could hear the others (in one larger group) this lead rider was less obvious hence the catching me unawares. However this is less likely than bikers catching you unawares and I've not really had any issues with bikers yet just like I haven't really with engined bikers.

It is something people will no doubt debate for a few pages of posts (if the MTB rant thread is anything to go on).

Posted: 01/08/2011 at 12:24

See more comments...
Talkback: Clearing Up Their Own Mess

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct:

Latest news

New Review: Haglöfs Ambo Long Shorts
Latest OM site review is the new Haglöfs Ambo Shorts, long,...
Friday Matinee - Biking Special
Watch the entire new Anthills film Strength In Numbers for...
Weekend Mountain Weather Outlook
OM's unexpurgated interpretation of this weekend's mountain...
Cool Summits Everest Again With Medal
'Everest Like An Amusement Park' - Moro